Player Stats

Reese Donahue College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
103
TFL
12
Sacks
5
QB hurries
2
Passes defended
1

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2016 Regular SeasonWest Virginia612-0--039.8
2017 PostseasonWest Virginia1230.50--056.6
2017 Regular SeasonWest Virginia12375.512-056.6
2018 PostseasonWest Virginia93-0--019
2018 Regular SeasonWest Virginia92121--019
2019 Regular SeasonWest Virginia122743-1042.1

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason

West Virginia paired 9 primary output with 21.4 efficiency.

Supporting note

2019 Regular Season role shape

impact-led usage with 16 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value is trending up

2019 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: NC State

Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2019 Regular Season · West Virginia

Games

12

Havoc Plays / G

0.7

Efficiency

16

Usage

6

Consistency

13.9

Best Game by takeover score

NC State

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456789101112

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. James Madison: 0. Missouri: 0. NC State: 2. Kansas: 0. Texas: 0. Iowa State: 2. Oklahoma: 2. Baylor: 1. Texas Tech: 1. Kansas State: 0. Oklahoma State: 0. TCU: 0

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. James Madison: 1 by 4.2. Missouri: 2 by 8.3. NC State: 4 by 36.7. Kansas: 2 by 8.3. Texas: 3 by 12.5. Iowa State: 2 by 28.3. Oklahoma: 2 by 28.3. Baylor: 3 by 22.5. Texas Tech: 3 by 22.5. Kansas State: 1 by 4.2. Oklahoma State: 2 by 8.3. TCU: 2 by 8.3

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins0.4 · Games = 5 · -0.5 vs Losses
Losses0.9 · Games = 7 · +0.5 vs Wins