Usage Score
13.3
Player Dossier
2017-2021Ohio
Ryan Luehrman
TE • 6'4" • 250 lbs • Athens, OH, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Ryan Luehrman reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
68.4
Consistency
64.9
Season Value
51.8
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason · Ohio
171819192021
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- Ohio
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Louisiana
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Ryan Luehrman, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason · Ohio. Ryan Luehrman reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Ryan Luehrman played TE for Ohio. Across 5 tracked seasons, Ryan Luehrman recorded 643 receiving yards, 4 tackles, and 7 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2019 with Ohio.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason
Ohio paired 360 primary output with 74.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2021 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 68.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2021 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Central Michigan
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2021 Regular Season · Ohio
Games
10
Receiving Yards / G
21.7
Efficiency
68.4
Usage
13.3
Consistency
64.9
Best Game by takeover score
Bowling Green
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Syracuse: 7. Unknown: 25. Louisiana: 8. Northwestern: 22. Central Michigan: 44. Buffalo: 12. Kent State: 32. Miami (OH): 5. Toledo: 20. Bowling Green: 42
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Syracuse: 1 by 46.7. Unknown: 2 by 83.3. Louisiana: 1 by 53.3. Northwestern: 2 by 73.3. Central Michigan: 4 by 73.3. Buffalo: 1 by 80. Kent State: 3 by 71.1. Miami (OH): 1 by 33.3. Toledo: 1 by 100. Bowling Green: 4 by 70
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Losses23.4 · Games = 8
First Half21.2 · Games = 5 · -1 vs Second Half
Second Half22.2 · Games = 5 · +1 vs First Half
All Games21.7 · Games = 10
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
10 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Central Michigan
Best efficiency game
100 vs Toledo
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 11/26 | @ Bowling Green | L 10-21 | — | 4 | 42 | 10.5 | 10.50 | 0 | 23 |
| Wed 11/17 | vs Toledo | L 23-35 | — | 1 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 0 | 20 |
| Tue 11/2 | vs Miami (OH) | W 35-33 | — | 1 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 5 |
| Sat 10/23 | vs Kent State | L 27-34 | — | 3 | 32 | 10.7 | 10.70 | 0 | 22 |
| Sat 10/16 | @ Buffalo | L 26-27 | — | 1 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 10/9 | vs Central Michigan | L 27-30 | — | 4 | 44 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 16 |
| Sat 9/25 | @ Northwestern | L 6-35 | — | 2 | 22 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 15 |
| Fri 9/17 | @ Louisiana | L 14-49 | — | 1 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 8 |
| Sat 9/11 | vs Unknown | — | — | 2 | 25 | 12.5 | 12.50 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 9/4 | vs Syracuse | L 9-29 | — | 1 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 7 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Ohio
2017-2021
Opening stop
Season Progression
201720182019201920202021
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 Regular Season | Ohio | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2018 Regular Season | Ohio | 8 | 26.7 | 5.6 | 8 |
| 2019 Postseason | Ohio | 360 | 74.7 | 15.6 | 352 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Ohio | 360 | 74.7 | 15.6 | 0 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Ohio | 58 | 62.7 | 27 | -302 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Ohio | 217 | 68.4 | 13.3 | 159 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Louisiana
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
69
Primary metric
69 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Marshall
60
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
60 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Central Michigan
44
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
44 receiving yards with a 73.3 efficiency score.
#4
Bowling Green
42
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
42 receiving yards with a 70 efficiency score.
#5
Northern Illinois
53
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
53 receiving yards with a 88.3 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2019 Postseason · Ohio
360 primary output · 74.7 efficiency · 15.6 usage
61.8
#2
2019 Regular Season · Ohio
61.8
360 primary · 74.7 efficiency · 15.6 usage
#3
2021 Regular Season · Ohio
51.8
217 primary · 68.4 efficiency · 13.3 usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
2★
Class 2015 · Rating 0.7533
Athens · The Plains, OH
- Committed To
- Ohio
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2015
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
643
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 28 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.