Player Stats

Joshua Wheeler College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
78
TFL
15.5
Sacks
9
QB hurries
2
Passes defended
2

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2016 PostseasonNorth Texas12810--070.3
2016 Regular SeasonNorth Texas12346.55.512070.3
2017 PostseasonNorth Texas9621--060
2017 Regular SeasonNorth Texas93062.51-060

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason

North Texas paired 16 primary output with 27.9 efficiency.

Supporting note

2017 Postseason role shape

impact-led usage with 30.6 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2017 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: UAB

Win with backfield disruption leading the way. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2017 Postseason · North Texas

Games

9

Havoc Plays / G

1.4

Efficiency

30.6

Usage

13.2

Consistency

31.4

Best Game by takeover score

UAB

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456789

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Troy: 3. SMU: 1. UAB: 5. UTSA: 0.5. Florida Atlantic: 1. Old Dominion: 0. Army: 1. Rice: 0. Florida Atlantic: 1

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Troy: 6 by 55. SMU: 5 by 30.8. UAB: 6 by 75. UTSA: 3 by 17.5. Florida Atlantic: 3 by 22.5. Old Dominion: 1 by 4.2. Army: 7 by 39.2. Rice: 2 by 8.3. Florida Atlantic: 3 by 22.5

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins1.3 · Games = 5 · -0.2 vs Losses
Losses1.5 · Games = 4 · +0.2 vs Wins