Usage Score
4.9
Player Dossier
2016-2019North Texas
S • 5'11" • 188 lbs • Dallas, TX, USA
Khairi Muhammad shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 27.8 disruption score.
Usage Score
4.9
Efficiency
27.8
Consistency
11.1
Season Value
12.5
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason · North Texas
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Khairi Muhammad, S. Best season Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason · North Texas. Khairi Muhammad shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 27.8 disruption score.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason
North Texas paired 10.5 primary output with 29.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
2019 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with 27.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2019 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Middle Tennessee
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
12
Havoc Plays / G
0.5
Efficiency
27.8
Usage
4.9
Consistency
11.1
Best Game by takeover score
UAB
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Unknown: 0.5. SMU: 0. California: 0. UTSA: 0. Houston: 0. Southern Miss: 2. Middle Tennessee: 2. Charlotte: 0. UTEP: 0. Louisiana Tech: 1. Rice: 0. UAB: 0
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Unknown: 5 by 25.8. SMU: 6 by 25. California: 6 by 25. UTSA: 6 by 25. Houston: 6 by 25. Southern Miss: 2 by 28.3. Middle Tennessee: 5 by 40.8. Charlotte: 13 by 50. UTEP: 4 by 16.7. Louisiana Tech: 5 by 30.8. Rice: 6 by 25. UAB: 4 by 16.7
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Middle Tennessee
Best efficiency game
50 vs Charlotte
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/30 | vs UAB | L 21-26 | 4 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/23 | @ Rice | L 14-20 | 6 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/9 | @ Louisiana Tech | L 17-52 | 5 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/2 | vs UTEP | W 52-26 | 4 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/26 | @ Charlotte10+ tackles | L 38-39 | 13 | 7 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/19 | vs Middle Tennessee | W 33-30 | 5 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 2 | — | — |
| Sat 10/12 | @ Southern Miss | L 27-45 | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 2 | — | — |
| Sun 9/29 | vs Houston | L 25-46 | 6 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/21 | vs UTSA | W 45-3 | 6 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/14 | @ California | L 17-23 | 6 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/7 | @ SMU | L 27-49 | 6 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 8/31 | vs Unknown | — | 5 | 2 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
North Texas
2016-2019
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 Postseason | North Texas | 3 | 10.3 | 1.8 | — |
| 2016 Regular Season | North Texas | 3 | 10.3 | 1.8 | 0 |
| 2017 Postseason | North Texas | 4.5 | 30.9 | 6.2 | 1.5 |
| 2017 Regular Season | North Texas | 4.5 | 30.9 | 6.2 | 0 |
| 2018 Postseason | North Texas | 10.5 | 29.5 | 5.6 | 6 |
| 2018 Regular Season | North Texas | 10.5 | 29.5 | 5.6 | 0 |
| 2019 Regular Season | North Texas | 5.5 | 27.8 | 4.9 | -5 |
#1 Featured game
SMU
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2
Primary metric
2 disruption/tackle impact with 53.5 takeover score.
#2
Arkansas
3
Primary metric
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 50.8 takeover score.
#3
Middle Tennessee
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 48.4 takeover score.
#4
Southern Miss
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 43.7 takeover score.
#5
Southern Miss
2
Primary metric
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 43.2 takeover score.
#1 Season by value score
2018 Postseason · North Texas
10.5 primary output · 29.5 efficiency · 5.6 usage
25.2
#2
2018 Regular Season · North Texas
25.2
10.5 primary · 29.5 efficiency · 5.6 usage
#3
2017 Postseason · North Texas
12.9
4.5 primary · 30.9 efficiency · 6.2 usage
0
Impact games
1
Splash games
5
10+ tackle games
Recruit Profile
Class 2016 · Rating 0.7583
DeSoto · DeSoto, TX
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
244
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 48 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Khairi Muhammad quick answers
Recruiting profile
2-star recruit