Usage Score
4.1
Player Dossier
2016-2019North Texas
Jameel Moore
DB • 5'10" • 181 lbs • Cedar Hill, TX, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Jameel Moore shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 22.4 disruption score.
Efficiency
22.4
Consistency
14.8
Season Value
14.6
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason · North Texas
161617181819
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- North Texas
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: UTEP
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Jameel Moore, DB. Best season Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason · North Texas. Jameel Moore shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 22.4 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason
North Texas paired 0 primary output with 6.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
2019 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with 22.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2019 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: UTEP
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2019 Regular Season · North Texas
Games
9
Havoc Plays / G
0.7
Efficiency
22.4
Usage
4.1
Consistency
14.8
Best Game by takeover score
UAB
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Unknown: 0. SMU: 1. UTSA: 0. Southern Miss: 1. Middle Tennessee: 1. UTEP: 3. Louisiana Tech: 0. Rice: 0. UAB: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Unknown: 6 by 25. SMU: 6 by 35. UTSA: 1 by 4.2. Southern Miss: 2 by 18.3. Middle Tennessee: 6 by 35. UTEP: 5 by 50.8. Louisiana Tech: 4 by 16.7. Rice: 2 by 8.3. UAB: 2 by 8.3
Split Comparison
Wins1.3 · n=3 · +0.9 vs Losses
Losses0.4 · n=5 · -0.9 vs Wins
First Half0.6 · n=5 · -0.2 vs Second Half
Second Half0.8 · n=4 · +0.2 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
9 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
UTEP
Best efficiency game
50.8 vs UTEP
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/30 | vs UAB | L 21-26 | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/23 | @ Rice | L 14-20 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/9 | @ Louisiana Tech | L 17-52 | 4 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/2 | vs UTEP | W 52-26 | 5 | 5 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 3 | — | — |
| Sat 10/19 | vs Middle Tennessee | W 33-30 | 6 | 3 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/12 | @ Southern Miss | L 27-45 | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 9/21 | vs UTSA | W 45-3 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/7 | @ SMU | L 27-49 | 6 | 5 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 8/31 | vs Unknown | — | 6 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
North Texas
2016-2019
Opening stop
Season Progression
201620162017201820182019
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 Postseason | North Texas | 0 | 6.3 | 1 | — |
| 2016 Regular Season | North Texas | 0 | 6.3 | 1 | 0 |
| 2017 Regular Season | North Texas | 0 | 4.2 | 0.8 | 0 |
| 2018 Postseason | North Texas | 4 | 14.5 | 2 | 4 |
| 2018 Regular Season | North Texas | 4 | 14.5 | 2 | 0 |
| 2019 Regular Season | North Texas | 6 | 22.4 | 4.1 | 2 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
UTEP
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3
Primary metric
3 disruption/tackle impact with 51.5 takeover score.
#2
Southern Miss
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 46.5 takeover score.
#3
Middle Tennessee
1
Primary metric
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 28.8 takeover score.
#4
UAB
1
Primary metric
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 24.9 takeover score.
#5
SMU
1
Primary metric
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 24.1 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2016 Postseason · North Texas
0 primary output · 6.3 efficiency · 1 usage
35.7
#2
2016 Regular Season · North Texas
35.7
0 primary · 6.3 efficiency · 1 usage
#3
2017 Regular Season · North Texas
35
0 primary · 4.2 efficiency · 0.8 usage
Milestones
0
Impact games
0
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
2★
Class 2016 · Rating 0.7793
Cedar Hill · Cedar Hill, TX
- Committed To
- North Texas
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2016
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
70
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 24 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.