Usage Score
8.1
Player Dossier
2016-2019Miami (OH)
DL • 6'2" • 295 lbs • West Chester, PA, USA
Doug Costin shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 31.1 disruption score.
Usage Score
8.1
Efficiency
31.1
Consistency
46.2
Season Value
29.7
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2017 Regular Season · Miami (OH)
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Doug Costin, DL. Best season Best season by value score: 2017 Regular Season · Miami (OH). Doug Costin shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 31.1 disruption score.
Doug Costin played DL for Miami (OH). Across 4 tracked seasons, Doug Costin recorded 173 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2019 with Miami (OH).
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2017 Regular Season
Miami (OH) paired 19.5 primary output with 32.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
2019 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 31.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2019 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Ball State
Loss with 3.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
14
Havoc Plays / G
1.4
Efficiency
31.1
Usage
8.1
Consistency
46.2
Best Game by takeover score
Louisiana
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Louisiana: 0. Iowa: 0. Unknown: 0.5. Cincinnati: 1. Ohio State: 1. Buffalo: 2. Western Michigan: 2. Northern Illinois: 1. Kent State: 1. Ohio: 2. Bowling Green: 0. Akron: 2. Ball State: 3.5. Central Michigan: 3
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Louisiana: 3 by 12.5. Iowa: 2 by 8.3. Unknown: 3 by 17.5. Cincinnati: 5 by 30.8. Ohio State: 3 by 22.5. Buffalo: 7 by 49.2. Western Michigan: 3 by 32.5. Northern Illinois: 5 by 30.8. Kent State: 1 by 14.2. Ohio: 7 by 49.2. Bowling Green: 5 by 20.8. Akron: 4 by 36.7. Ball State: 7 by 64.2. Central Michigan: 4 by 46.7
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
14 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Ball State
Best efficiency game
64.2 vs Ball State
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tue 1/7 | vs Louisiana | L 17-27 | 3 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 12/7 | @ Central Michigan | W 26-21 | 4 | 1 | — | 0.50 | 0.50 | — | 2 | — | — |
| Fri 11/29 | @ Ball State | L 27-41 | 7 | 4 | — | 1.50 | 1 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Thu 11/21 | vs Akron | W 20-17 | 4 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Thu 11/14 | vs Bowling Green | W 44-3 | 5 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Thu 11/7 | @ OhioSplash game | W 24-21 | 7 | 2 | — | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/26 | @ Kent State | W 23-16 | 1 | 0 | — | 0.50 | 0.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/19 | vs Northern Illinois | W 27-24 | 5 | 0 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/12 | @ Western Michigan | L 16-38 | 3 | 0 | — | 1.50 | 0.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/28 | vs BuffaloSplash game | W 34-20 | 7 | 5 | — | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/21 | @ Ohio State | L 5-76 | 3 | 0 | — | 0.50 | 0.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/14 | @ Cincinnati | L 13-35 | 5 | 1 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/7 | vs Unknown | — | 3 | 0 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 8/31 | @ Iowa | L 14-38 | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Miami (OH)
2016-2019
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 Postseason | Miami (OH) | 3 | 10.9 | 3 | — |
| 2016 Regular Season | Miami (OH) | 3 | 10.9 | 3 | 0 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Miami (OH) | 19.5 | 32.1 | 10.5 | 16.5 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Miami (OH) | 17.5 | 32.1 | 9.6 | -2 |
| 2019 Postseason | Miami (OH) | 19 | 31.1 | 8.1 | 1.5 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Miami (OH) | 19 | 31.1 | 8.1 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Minnesota
Loss with 6 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
6
Primary metric
6 disruption/tackle impact with 67.6 takeover score.
#2
Akron
6
Primary metric
Win with backfield disruption leading the way.
6 disruption/tackle impact with 67.4 takeover score.
#3
Ball State
3.5
Primary metric
Loss with 3.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3.5 disruption/tackle impact with 60.7 takeover score.
#4
Eastern Michigan
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 48.1 takeover score.
#5
Central Michigan
3
Primary metric
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 47.1 takeover score.
#1 Season by value score
2017 Regular Season · Miami (OH)
19.5 primary output · 32.1 efficiency · 10.5 usage
29.8
#2
2019 Postseason · Miami (OH)
29.7
19 primary · 31.1 efficiency · 8.1 usage
#3
2019 Regular Season · Miami (OH)
29.7
19 primary · 31.1 efficiency · 8.1 usage
3
Impact games
4
Splash games
1
10+ tackle games
Recruit Profile
Class 2016 · Rating 0.7785
Bishop Shanahan · Downingtown, PA
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
173
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 47 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.