Usage Score
30.4
Player Dossier
2017-2021Miami (OH)
Jack Sorenson
WR • 6'0" • 195 lbs • Kildeer, IL, USA
Alpha targetExplosive finisher
Jack Sorenson reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
97.1
Consistency
69.2
Season Value
74.2
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2021 Postseason · Miami (OH)
17181919202121
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 7
- Program Path
- Miami (OH)
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Central Michigan
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Jack Sorenson, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2021 Postseason · Miami (OH). Jack Sorenson reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2021 Postseason
Miami (OH) paired 1,406 primary output with 97.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
2021 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 97.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2021 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Ohio
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2021 Postseason · Miami (OH)
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
108.2
Efficiency
97.1
Usage
30.4
Consistency
69.2
Best Game by takeover score
North Texas
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. North Texas: 116. Cincinnati: 32. Minnesota: 97. Unknown: 86. Army: 48. Central Michigan: 66. Eastern Michigan: 123. Akron: 113. Ball State: 138. Ohio: 283. Buffalo: 112. Bowling Green: 111. Kent State: 81
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. North Texas: 7 by 100. Cincinnati: 2 by 100. Minnesota: 6 by 100. Unknown: 5 by 100. Army: 2 by 100. Central Michigan: 7 by 62.9. Eastern Michigan: 7 by 100. Akron: 5 by 100. Ball State: 8 by 100. Ohio: 14 by 100. Buffalo: 5 by 100. Bowling Green: 4 by 100. Kent State: 4 by 100
Split Comparison
Wins109.3 · n=6 · -1.3 vs Losses
Losses110.7 · n=6 · +1.3 vs Wins
First Half81.1 · n=7 · -58.5 vs Second Half
Second Half139.7 · n=6 · +58.5 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Ohio
Best efficiency game
100 vs North Texas
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thu 12/23 | vs North Texas100 receiving yards | W 27-14 | — | 7 | 116 | 16.6 | 16.60 | 0 | 51 |
| Sat 11/27 | @ Kent State | L 47-48 | — | 4 | 81 | 20.3 | 20.30 | 1 | 30 |
| Wed 11/17 | vs Bowling Green100 receiving yards | W 34-7 | — | 4 | 111 | 27.8 | 27.80 | 1 | 83 |
| Wed 11/10 | vs Buffalo100 receiving yards | W 45-18 | — | 5 | 112 | 22.4 | 22.40 | 1 | 58 |
| Tue 11/2 | @ Ohio100 receiving yards · High volume | L 33-35 | — | 14 | 283 | 20.2 | 20.20 | 2 | 82 |
| Sat 10/23 | @ Ball State100 receiving yards · High volume | W 24-17 | — | 8 | 138 | 17.3 | 17.30 | 0 | 31 |
| Sat 10/16 | vs Akron100 receiving yards | W 34-21 | — | 5 | 113 | 22.6 | 22.60 | 1 | 57 |
| Sat 10/9 | @ Eastern Michigan100 receiving yards | L 12-13 | — | 7 | 123 | 17.6 | 17.60 | 0 | 43 |
| Sat 10/2 | vs Central Michigan2+ TD | W 28-17 | — | 7 | 66 | 9.4 | 9.40 | 2 | 36 |
| Sat 9/25 | @ Army | L 10-23 | — | 2 | 48 | 24 | 24 | 0 | 37 |
| Sat 9/18 | vs Unknown | — | — | 5 | 86 | 17.2 | 17.20 | 1 | 22 |
| Sat 9/11 | @ Minnesota | L 26-31 | — | 6 | 97 | 16.2 | 16.20 | 1 | 26 |
| Sat 9/4 | @ Cincinnati | L 14-49 | — | 2 | 32 | 16 | 16 | 0 | 18 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Miami (OH)
2017-2021
Opening stop
Season Progression
2017201820192019202020212021
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 Regular Season | Miami (OH) | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2018 Regular Season | Miami (OH) | 742 | 76.8 | 26.3 | 742 |
| 2019 Postseason | Miami (OH) | 568 | 78.6 | 32.5 | -174 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Miami (OH) | 568 | 78.6 | 32.5 | 0 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Miami (OH) | 354 | 94.8 | 38.4 | -214 |
| 2021 Postseason | Miami (OH) | 1,406 | 97.1 | 30.4 | 1,052 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Miami (OH) | 1,406 | 97.1 | 30.4 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Central Michigan
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
123
Primary metric
123 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Akron
177
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
177 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Ohio
283
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
283 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Western Michigan
156
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
156 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Ball State
139
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
139 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2021 Postseason · Miami (OH)
1,406 primary output · 97.1 efficiency · 30.4 usage
74.2
#2
2021 Regular Season · Miami (OH)
74.2
1,406 primary · 97.1 efficiency · 30.4 usage
#3
2020 Regular Season · Miami (OH)
58.2
354 primary · 94.8 efficiency · 38.4 usage
Milestones
13
100+ receiving yards
6
8+ catch outings
3
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
2★
Class 2016 · Rating 0.7819
Adlai Stevenson · Lincolnshire, IL
- Committed To
- Miami (OH)
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2016
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
3,070
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 39 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.