Usage Score
11.7
Player Dossier
2016-2019Kent State
Theo Majette
DL • 5'11" • 238 lbs • West Bloomfield, MI, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Theo Majette shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 32.7 disruption score.
Efficiency
32.7
Consistency
53.1
Season Value
34.7
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason · Kent State
1617181919
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- Kent State
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Bowling Green
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Theo Majette, DL. Best season Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason · Kent State. Theo Majette shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 32.7 disruption score.
Theo Majette played DL for Kent State. Across 4 tracked seasons, Theo Majette recorded 80 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2019 with Kent State.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason
Kent State paired 14 primary output with 32.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2019 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 32.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2019 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Arizona State
Loss with backfield disruption leading the way. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2019 Postseason · Kent State
Games
9
Havoc Plays / G
1.6
Efficiency
32.7
Usage
11.7
Consistency
53.1
Best Game by takeover score
Utah State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Utah State: 2. Arizona State: 4. Unknown: 2. Auburn: 0. Bowling Green: 3. Akron: 0. Ohio: 0. Toledo: 0. Ball State: 3
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Utah State: 4 by 36.7. Arizona State: 3 by 52.5. Unknown: 11 by 65.8. Auburn: 1 by 4.2. Bowling Green: 4 by 46.7. Akron: 1 by 4.2. Ohio: 5 by 20.8. Toledo: 1 by 4.2. Ball State: 7 by 59.2
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins2 · Games = 4 · +1 vs Losses
Losses1 · Games = 4 · -1 vs Wins
First Half2.2 · Games = 5 · +1.5 vs Second Half
Second Half0.8 · Games = 4 · -1.5 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
9 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Arizona State
Best efficiency game
65.8 vs Unknown
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/21 | vs Utah State | W 51-41 | 4 | 2 | — | 1.50 | 0.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/23 | vs Ball StateSplash game | W 41-38 | 7 | 6 | — | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Wed 11/6 | @ Toledo | L 33-35 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/19 | @ Ohio | L 38-45 | 5 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/12 | @ Akron | W 26-3 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/21 | vs Bowling GreenSplash game | W 62-20 | 4 | 3 | — | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/14 | @ Auburn | L 16-55 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/7 | vs Unknown10+ tackles | — | 11 | 4 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Fri 8/30 | @ Arizona State2+ sacks · Splash game | L 7-30 | 3 | 2 | — | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Kent State
2016-2019
Opening stop
Season Progression
20162017201820192019
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 Regular Season | Kent State | 1 | 5.7 | 1.5 | — |
| 2017 Regular Season | Kent State | 10.5 | 22 | 7.4 | 9.5 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Kent State | 10 | 17.8 | 7.8 | -0.5 |
| 2019 Postseason | Kent State | 14 | 32.7 | 11.7 | 4 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Kent State | 14 | 32.7 | 11.7 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Bowling Green
Win with backfield disruption leading the way.
4
Primary metric
4 disruption/tackle impact with 61.4 takeover score.
#2
Western Michigan
4
Primary metric
Loss with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
4 disruption/tackle impact with 57.8 takeover score.
#3
Arizona State
4
Primary metric
Loss with backfield disruption leading the way.
4 disruption/tackle impact with 57.1 takeover score.
#4
Ball State
3
Primary metric
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 54.3 takeover score.
#5
Bowling Green
3
Primary metric
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 48.6 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2019 Postseason · Kent State
14 primary output · 32.7 efficiency · 11.7 usage
34.7
#2
2019 Regular Season · Kent State
34.7
14 primary · 32.7 efficiency · 11.7 usage
#3
2017 Regular Season · Kent State
25
10.5 primary · 22 efficiency · 7.4 usage
Milestones
1
Impact games
5
Splash games
1
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
2★
Class 2016 · Rating 0.7644
West Bloomfield · West Bloomfield, MI
- Committed To
- Kent State
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2016
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
80
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 32 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.