Usage Score
7.1
Player Dossier
2016-2021Kent State
LB • 6'0" • 200 lbs • Steubenville, OH, USA
Mandela Lawrence-Burke shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 34.7 disruption score.
Usage Score
7.1
Efficiency
34.7
Consistency
12.8
Season Value
37.6
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2019 Postseason · Kent State
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Mandela Lawrence-Burke, LB. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2019 Postseason · Kent State. Mandela Lawrence-Burke shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 34.7 disruption score.
Mandela Lawrence-Burke played LB for Kent State. Across 6 tracked seasons, Mandela Lawrence-Burke recorded 13 receiving yards and 278 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2019 with Kent State.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason
Kent State paired 11.5 primary output with 41.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2021 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 34.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2021 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Miami (OH)
Win with 3.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Havoc Plays / G
0.8
Efficiency
34.7
Usage
7.1
Consistency
12.8
Best Game by takeover score
Miami (OH)
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Wyoming: 0. Texas A&M: 0. VMI: 1. Iowa: 0. Maryland: 0. Bowling Green: 1. Buffalo: 3. Western Michigan: 0. Ohio: 2. Central Michigan: 0. Akron: 0.5. Miami (OH): 3.5. Northern Illinois: 0
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Wyoming: 8 by 33.3. Texas A&M: 1 by 4.2. VMI: 2 by 18.3. Iowa: 5 by 20.8. Maryland: 2 by 8.3. Bowling Green: 7 by 39.2. Buffalo: 13 by 80. Western Michigan: 8 by 33.3. Ohio: 14 by 70. Central Michigan: 2 by 8.3. Akron: 7 by 34.2. Miami (OH): 7 by 64.2. Northern Illinois: 9 by 37.5
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Miami (OH)
Best efficiency game
80 vs Buffalo
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tue 12/21 | @ Wyoming | L 38-52 | 8 | 6 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 12/4 | @ Northern Illinois | L 23-41 | 9 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/27 | vs Miami (OH)Splash game | W 48-47 | 7 | 4 | — | 1.50 | 0 | 1 | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 11/20 | @ Akron | W 38-0 | 7 | 4 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Thu 11/11 | @ Central Michigan | L 30-54 | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/23 | @ Ohio10+ tackles · Splash game | W 34-27 | 14 | 7 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/16 | @ Western Michigan | L 31-64 | 8 | 8 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/9 | vs Buffalo10+ tackles · Splash game | W 48-38 | 13 | 7 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 3 | — | — |
| Sat 10/2 | vs Bowling Green | W 27-20 | 7 | 6 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/25 | @ Maryland | L 16-37 | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/18 | @ Iowa | L 7-30 | 5 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/11 | vs VMI | W 60-10 | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sun 9/5 | @ Texas A&M | L 10-41 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Kent State
2016-2021
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 Regular Season | Kent State | 0 | 5.8 | 0.9 | — |
| 2017 Regular Season | Kent State | 8 | 33.1 | 8.9 | 8 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Kent State | 0 | 0 | 0 | -8 |
| 2019 Postseason | Kent State | 11.5 | 41.2 | 10 | 11.5 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Kent State | 11.5 | 41.2 | 10 | 0 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Kent State | 3 | 29.5 | 7.5 | -8.5 |
| 2021 Postseason | Kent State | 11 | 34.7 | 7.1 | 8 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Kent State | 11 | 34.7 | 7.1 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Eastern Michigan
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3
Primary metric
3 disruption/tackle impact with 67 takeover score.
#2
Buffalo
3
Primary metric
Loss with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 66.4 takeover score.
#3
Miami (OH)
3
Primary metric
Loss with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 63.2 takeover score.
#4
Miami (OH)
3.5
Primary metric
Win with 3.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3.5 disruption/tackle impact with 62.5 takeover score.
#5
Auburn
3
Primary metric
Loss with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 61.8 takeover score.
#1 Season by Season Value
2019 Postseason · Kent State
11.5 primary output · 41.2 efficiency · 10 usage
41.3
#2
2019 Regular Season · Kent State
41.3
11.5 primary · 41.2 efficiency · 10 usage
#3
2021 Postseason · Kent State
37.6
11 primary · 34.7 efficiency · 7.1 usage
5
Impact games
9
Splash games
10
10+ tackle games
Recruit Profile
Class 2016 · Rating 0.7633
Steubenville · Steubenville, OH
Career Facts
1
Career teams
8
Seasons tracked
278
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 8 tracked seasons, 47 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.