Usage Score
7.6
Player Dossier
2016-2021Kent State
Mandela Lawrence-Burke
LB • 6'0" • 200 lbs • Steubenville, OH, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Mandela Lawrence-Burke shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 33.2 disruption score.
Efficiency
33.2
Consistency
10.3
Season Value
15.4
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season · Kent State
1617181919202121
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 8
- Program Path
- Kent State
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Buffalo
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Mandela Lawrence-Burke, LB. Best season Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season · Kent State. Mandela Lawrence-Burke shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 33.2 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season
Kent State paired 0 primary output with 5.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
2021 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 33.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2021 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Miami (OH)
Win with 3.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2021 Postseason · Kent State
Games
13
Havoc Plays / G
0.7
Efficiency
33.2
Usage
7.6
Consistency
10.3
Best Game by takeover score
Wyoming
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Wyoming: 0. Texas A&M: 0. Unknown: 1. Iowa: 0. Maryland: 0. Bowling Green: 0. Buffalo: 3. Western Michigan: 0. Ohio: 1. Central Michigan: 0. Akron: 0.5. Miami (OH): 3.5. Northern Illinois: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Wyoming: 8 by 33.3. Texas A&M: 1 by 4.2. Unknown: 2 by 18.3. Iowa: 5 by 20.8. Maryland: 2 by 8.3. Bowling Green: 7 by 29.2. Buffalo: 13 by 80. Western Michigan: 8 by 33.3. Ohio: 14 by 60. Central Michigan: 2 by 8.3. Akron: 7 by 34.2. Miami (OH): 7 by 64.2. Northern Illinois: 9 by 37.5
Split Comparison
Wins1.6 · n=5 · +1.6 vs Losses
Losses0 · n=7 · -1.6 vs Wins
First Half0.6 · n=7 · -0.3 vs Second Half
Second Half0.8 · n=6 · +0.3 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Miami (OH)
Best efficiency game
80 vs Buffalo
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tue 12/21 | @ Wyoming | L 38-52 | 8 | 6 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 12/4 | @ Northern Illinois | L 23-41 | 9 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/27 | vs Miami (OH)Splash game | W 48-47 | 7 | 4 | — | 1.50 | 0 | 1 | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 11/20 | @ Akron | W 38-0 | 7 | 4 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Thu 11/11 | @ Central Michigan | L 30-54 | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/23 | @ Ohio10+ tackles | W 34-27 | 14 | 7 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/16 | @ Western Michigan | L 31-64 | 8 | 8 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/9 | vs Buffalo10+ tackles | W 48-38 | 13 | 7 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 3 | — | — |
| Sat 10/2 | vs Bowling Green | W 27-20 | 7 | 6 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/25 | @ Maryland | L 16-37 | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/18 | @ Iowa | L 7-30 | 5 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/11 | vs Unknown | — | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sun 9/5 | @ Texas A&M | L 10-41 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Kent State
2016-2021
Opening stop
Season Progression
20162017201820192019202020212021
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 Regular Season | Kent State | 0 | 5.8 | 0.9 | — |
| 2017 Regular Season | Kent State | 8 | 33.1 | 10.4 | 8 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Kent State | 0 | 0 | 0 | -8 |
| 2019 Postseason | Kent State | 10.5 | 40.4 | 9.6 | 10.5 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Kent State | 10.5 | 40.4 | 9.6 | 0 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Kent State | 3 | 29.5 | 7.5 | -7.5 |
| 2021 Postseason | Kent State | 9 | 33.2 | 7.6 | 6 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Kent State | 9 | 33.2 | 7.6 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Buffalo
Loss with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3
Primary metric
3 disruption/tackle impact with 70.6 takeover score.
#2
Eastern Michigan
3
Primary metric
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 67 takeover score.
#3
Miami (OH)
3.5
Primary metric
Win with 3.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3.5 disruption/tackle impact with 67 takeover score.
#4
Miami (OH)
3
Primary metric
Loss with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 63.2 takeover score.
#5
Auburn
3
Primary metric
Loss with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 61.8 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2016 Regular Season · Kent State
0 primary output · 5.8 efficiency · 0.9 usage
35.6
#2
2018 Regular Season · Kent State
33.3
0 primary · 0 efficiency · 0 usage
#3
2017 Regular Season · Kent State
19.1
8 primary · 33.1 efficiency · 10.4 usage
Milestones
5
Impact games
4
Splash games
10
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
2★
Class 2016 · Rating 0.7633
Steubenville · Steubenville, OH
- Committed To
- Kent State
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2016
Career Facts
1
Career teams
8
Seasons tracked
278
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 8 tracked seasons, 47 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.