Player Stats

D.J. Wonnum College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
136
TFL
29
Sacks
14
QB hurries
7
Passes defended
5

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2016 PostseasonSouth Carolina133-0--021.6
2016 Regular SeasonSouth Carolina13293.51.52-021.6
2017 PostseasonSouth Carolina135-0--073.5
2017 Regular SeasonSouth Carolina135213625073.5
2018 Regular SeasonSouth Carolina31032--041.8
2019 Regular SeasonSouth Carolina11379.54.53-055.3

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason

South Carolina paired 26 primary output with 38.3 efficiency.

Supporting note

2019 Regular Season role shape

impact-led usage with 29.5 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value is trending up

2019 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Kentucky

Win with backfield disruption leading the way. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2019 Regular Season · South Carolina

Games

11

Havoc Plays / G

1.6

Efficiency

29.5

Usage

10.8

Consistency

32.5

Best Game by takeover score

Kentucky

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

1234567891011

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. North Carolina: 3. Charleston Southern: 1. Alabama: 0. Missouri: 1. Kentucky: 7. Georgia: 1. Florida: 2. Tennessee: 2. Vanderbilt: 1. App State: 0. Texas A&M: 0

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. North Carolina: 7 by 59.2. Charleston Southern: 0 by 10. Alabama: 4 by 16.7. Kentucky: 5 by 70.8. Georgia: 6 by 35. Florida: 3 by 32.5. Tennessee: 2 by 28.3. Vanderbilt: 2 by 18.3. App State: 4 by 16.7. Texas A&M: 4 by 16.7

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins2.5 · Games = 4 · +1.4 vs Losses
Losses1.1 · Games = 7 · -1.4 vs Wins