Player Stats

Trevon Sands College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Scrimmage yards
411
Rushing yards
383
Receiving yards
28
Touchdowns
2

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesScrimmageRush YdsRec YdsTDOverall
2016 PostseasonSouth Florida8000014.2
2016 Regular SeasonSouth Florida826260014.2
2017 Regular SeasonSouth Florida81111110028.9
2018 Regular SeasonSouth Florida639390021.3
2019 Regular SeasonSouth Florida823520728256.5

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2019 Regular Season

South Florida paired 235 primary output with 40.8 efficiency.

Supporting note

2019 Regular Season role shape

backfield-heavy usage with 40.8 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value is trending up

2019 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: BYU

Win with 64 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2019 Regular Season · South Florida

Games

8

Scrimmage Yards / G

29.4

Efficiency

40.8

Usage

12.8

Consistency

48.6

Best Game by takeover score

BYU

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Wisconsin: 15. SMU: 15. UConn: 64. BYU: 64. Navy: 25. East Carolina: 12. Temple: 32. Cincinnati: 8

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Wisconsin: 6 by 12.9. SMU: 4 by 38.5. UConn: 7 by 88.1. BYU: 11 by 63.6. Navy: 5 by 52.1. East Carolina: 9 by 18.8. Temple: 8 by 31.8. Cincinnati: 4 by 20.8

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins46.7 · Games = 3 · +27.7 vs Losses
Losses19 · Games = 5 · -27.7 vs Wins