Player Stats

Alex Turner College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
122
TFL
22.5
Sacks
8.5
QB hurries
6
Passes defended
1

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2016 Regular SeasonEast Carolina35-0--039.2
2017 Regular SeasonEast Carolina9171.51--017.2
2018 Regular SeasonEast Carolina114510421057.8
2019 Regular SeasonEast Carolina1155113.54-069.5
2020 Regular SeasonEast Carolina00-0--0-

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2019 Regular Season

East Carolina paired 18.5 primary output with 37.7 efficiency.

Supporting note

2019 Regular Season role shape

impact-led usage with 37.7 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value cooled off

2020 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Gardner-Webb

Win with backfield disruption leading the way. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2019 Regular Season · East Carolina

Games

11

Havoc Plays / G

1.7

Efficiency

37.7

Usage

12.6

Consistency

40.5

Best Game by takeover score

Gardner-Webb

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

1234567891011

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. NC State: 1. Gardner-Webb: 5. Navy: 2. William & Mary: 0.5. Old Dominion: 0.5. UCF: 1. South Florida: 3.5. Cincinnati: 2. SMU: 1. UConn: 2. Tulsa: 0

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. NC State: 7 by 39.2. Gardner-Webb: 7 by 79.2. Navy: 4 by 36.7. William & Mary: 3 by 17.5. Old Dominion: 5 by 25.8. UCF: 7 by 39.2. South Florida: 7 by 64.2. Cincinnati: 4 by 36.7. SMU: 4 by 26.7. UConn: 4 by 36.7. Tulsa: 3 by 12.5

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins2 · Games = 4 · +0.5 vs Losses
Losses1.5 · Games = 7 · -0.5 vs Wins