Usage Score
6.3
Player Dossier
2016-2019TCU
Vernon Scott
S • 6'2" • 206 lbs • Mansfield, TX, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Vernon Scott shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 29.3 disruption score.
Efficiency
29.3
Consistency
65.1
Season Value
31
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2017 Regular Season · TCU
1617181819
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- TCU
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Kansas
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Vernon Scott, S. Best season Best season by value score: 2017 Regular Season · TCU. Vernon Scott shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 29.3 disruption score.
Vernon Scott played S for TCU. Across 4 tracked seasons, Vernon Scott recorded 72 tackles and 2 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2019 with TCU.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2017 Regular Season
TCU paired 0 primary output with 4.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2019 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with 29.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2019 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Kansas
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2019 Regular Season · TCU
Games
10
Havoc Plays / G
1.1
Efficiency
29.3
Usage
6.3
Consistency
65.1
Best Game by takeover score
West Virginia
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Unknown: 1. Purdue: 0. Kansas: 3. Iowa State: 1. Kansas State: 1. Texas: 1. Oklahoma State: 0. Texas Tech: 1. Oklahoma: 1. West Virginia: 2
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Unknown: 6 by 35. Purdue: 2 by 8.3. Kansas: 1 by 34.2. Iowa State: 5 by 30.8. Kansas State: 6 by 35. Texas: 4 by 26.7. Oklahoma State: 3 by 12.5. Texas Tech: 5 by 30.8. Oklahoma: 7 by 39.2. West Virginia: 5 by 40.8
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins1.3 · Games = 4 · +0.3 vs Losses
Losses1 · Games = 5 · -0.3 vs Wins
First Half1.2 · Games = 5 · +0.2 vs Second Half
Second Half1 · Games = 5 · -0.2 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
10 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Kansas
Best efficiency game
40.8 vs West Virginia
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 11/29 | vs West Virginia | L 17-20 | 5 | 4 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 11/24 | @ Oklahoma | L 24-28 | 7 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/16 | @ Texas Tech | W 33-31 | 5 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 11/2 | @ Oklahoma State | L 27-34 | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/26 | vs Texas | W 37-27 | 4 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/19 | @ Kansas State | L 17-24 | 6 | 5 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/5 | @ Iowa State | L 24-49 | 5 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 9/28 | vs Kansas | W 51-14 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 3 | — | — |
| Sat 9/14 | @ Purdue | W 34-13 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 9/1 | vs Unknown | — | 6 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
TCU
2016-2019
Opening stop
Season Progression
20162017201820182019
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 Regular Season | TCU | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2017 Regular Season | TCU | 0 | 4.2 | 0.8 | 0 |
| 2018 Postseason | TCU | 3 | 15.1 | 2.9 | 3 |
| 2018 Regular Season | TCU | 3 | 15.1 | 2.9 | 0 |
| 2019 Regular Season | TCU | 11 | 29.3 | 6.3 | 8 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Kansas
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3
Primary metric
3 disruption/tackle impact with 45.2 takeover score.
#2
California
1
Primary metric
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 42.8 takeover score.
#3
West Virginia
2
Primary metric
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 40.4 takeover score.
#4
Ohio State
1
Primary metric
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 39.9 takeover score.
#5
Oklahoma State
1
Primary metric
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 36.7 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2017 Regular Season · TCU
0 primary output · 4.2 efficiency · 0.8 usage
35
#2
2019 Regular Season · TCU
31
11 primary · 29.3 efficiency · 6.3 usage
#3
2018 Postseason · TCU
8.9
3 primary · 15.1 efficiency · 2.9 usage
Milestones
0
Impact games
0
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2023 · Rating 0.8492
DeMatha Catholic · Hyattsville, MD
- Committed To
- South Florida
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2023
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
72
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 24 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.