Usage Score
10.4
Player Dossier
2016-2021Oklahoma State
LB • 6'0" • 235 lbs • Knoxville, TN, USA
Devin Harper shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 41.1 disruption score.
Usage Score
10.4
Efficiency
41.1
Consistency
35.4
Season Value
27
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2017 Regular Season · Oklahoma State
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Devin Harper, LB. Best season Best season by value score: 2017 Regular Season · Oklahoma State. Devin Harper shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 41.1 disruption score.
Devin Harper played LB for Oklahoma State. Across 6 tracked seasons, Devin Harper recorded 215 tackles and 2 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2021 with Oklahoma State.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2017 Regular Season
Oklahoma State paired 0 primary output with 5.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2021 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 41.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2021 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: West Virginia
Win with backfield disruption leading the way. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
14
Havoc Plays / G
1.3
Efficiency
41.1
Usage
10.4
Consistency
35.4
Best Game by takeover score
Notre Dame
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Notre Dame: 1. Unknown: 4. Tulsa: 0. Boise State: 0. Kansas State: 1. Baylor: 0. Texas: 1. Iowa State: 2. Kansas: 0. West Virginia: 5. TCU: 1. Texas Tech: 1. Oklahoma: 2. Baylor: 0
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Notre Dame: 10 by 51.7. Unknown: 9 by 77.5. Tulsa: 3 by 12.5. Boise State: 7 by 29.2. Kansas State: 3 by 22.5. Baylor: 7 by 29.2. Texas: 8 by 43.3. Iowa State: 9 by 57.5. Kansas: 4 by 16.7. West Virginia: 8 by 83.3. TCU: 7 by 39.2. Texas Tech: 5 by 30.8. Oklahoma: 10 by 61.7. Baylor: 5 by 20.8
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
14 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
West Virginia
Best efficiency game
83.3 vs West Virginia
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 1/1 | @ Notre Dame10+ tackles | W 37-35 | 10 | 4 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 12/4 | vs Baylor | L 16-21 | 5 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 11/28 | vs Oklahoma10+ tackles | W 37-33 | 10 | 7 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 11/21 | @ Texas Tech | W 23-0 | 5 | 4 | — | 0.50 | 0.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 11/14 | vs TCU | W 63-17 | 7 | 5 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/6 | @ West Virginia2+ sacks · Splash game | W 24-3 | 8 | 7 | — | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/30 | vs Kansas | W 55-3 | 4 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/23 | @ Iowa State | L 21-24 | 9 | 6 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/16 | @ Texas | W 32-24 | 8 | 6 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/2 | vs Baylor | W 24-14 | 7 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/25 | vs Kansas State | W 31-20 | 3 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sun 9/19 | @ Boise State | W 21-20 | 7 | 5 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/11 | vs Tulsa | W 28-23 | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/4 | vs UnknownSplash game | — | 9 | 5 | — | 2.50 | 1.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Oklahoma State
2016-2021
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 Regular Season | Oklahoma State | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 2017 Regular Season | Oklahoma State | 0 | 5.2 | 0.9 | 0 |
| 2018 Postseason | Oklahoma State | 9.5 | 21.4 | 5.3 | 9.5 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Oklahoma State | 9.5 | 21.4 | 5.3 | 0 |
| 2019 Postseason | Oklahoma State | 8 | 22.2 | 7.5 | -1.5 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Oklahoma State | 8 | 22.2 | 7.5 | 0 |
| 2020 Postseason | Oklahoma State | 9.5 | 22.7 | 5.4 | 1.5 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Oklahoma State | 9.5 | 22.7 | 5.4 | 0 |
| 2021 Postseason | Oklahoma State | 18 | 41.1 | 10.4 | 8.5 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Oklahoma State | 18 | 41.1 | 10.4 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
West Virginia
Win with backfield disruption leading the way.
5
Primary metric
5 disruption/tackle impact with 67.5 takeover score.
#2
Unknown
4
Primary metric
Game with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
4 disruption/tackle impact with 59.2 takeover score.
#3
Boise State
3
Primary metric
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 55.8 takeover score.
#4
Kansas
3
Primary metric
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 53.2 takeover score.
#5
TCU
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 49.8 takeover score.
#1 Season by value score
2017 Regular Season · Oklahoma State
0 primary output · 5.2 efficiency · 0.9 usage
35.4
#2
2016 Regular Season · Oklahoma State
33.3
0 primary · 0 efficiency · 0 usage
#3
2021 Postseason · Oklahoma State
27
18 primary · 41.1 efficiency · 10.4 usage
1
Impact games
3
Splash games
2
10+ tackle games
Recruit Profile
Class 2023 · Rating 0.85
Gibbs · St. Petersburg, FL
Career Facts
1
Career teams
10
Seasons tracked
215
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 10 tracked seasons, 53 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.