Player Stats

Amen Ogbongbemiga College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
208
TFL
25
Sacks
8.5
QB hurries
9

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2017 Regular SeasonOklahoma State6161.501-023.9
2018 PostseasonOklahoma State81-0--016.7
2018 Regular SeasonOklahoma State81131.5--016.7
2019 PostseasonOklahoma State131211--078.6
2019 Regular SeasonOklahoma State138814.545-078.6
2020 PostseasonOklahoma State114-0--047.1
2020 Regular SeasonOklahoma State1176523-047.1

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason

Oklahoma State paired 26.5 primary output with 52.4 efficiency.

Supporting note

2020 Postseason role shape

impact-led usage with 39 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2020 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: West Virginia

Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2020 Postseason · Oklahoma State

Games

11

Havoc Plays / G

0.9

Efficiency

39

Usage

9.4

Consistency

33.5

Best Game by takeover score

West Virginia

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

1234567891011

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Miami: 0. Tulsa: 0. West Virginia: 3. Kansas: 0.5. Iowa State: 0. Texas: 2. Kansas State: 1.5. Oklahoma: 0. Texas Tech: 2. TCU: 1. Baylor: 0

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Miami: 4 by 16.7. Tulsa: 4 by 16.7. West Virginia: 13 by 80. Kansas: 5 by 25.8. Iowa State: 3 by 12.5. Texas: 10 by 61.7. Kansas State: 8 by 48.3. Oklahoma: 8 by 33.3. Texas Tech: 11 by 65.8. TCU: 12 by 60. Baylor: 2 by 8.3

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins0.9 · Games = 8 · -0.1 vs Losses
Losses1 · Games = 3 · +0.1 vs Wins