Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason
Virginia Tech paired 3,315 primary output with 60.3 efficiency.
Player Stats
Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.
Stat Footprint
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Total Offense | Pass Yds | Rush Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 Regular Season | Virginia Tech | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | - |
| 2017 Postseason | Virginia Tech | 13 | 298 | 248 | 50 | 3 | 73.2 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Virginia Tech | 13 | 3,017 | 2,743 | 274 | 23 | 73.2 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Virginia Tech | 3 | 636 | 575 | 61 | 6 | 54.3 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Maryland | 10 | 1,221 | 1,274 | -53 | 12 | 45 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Maryland | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | - |
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason
Virginia Tech paired 3,315 primary output with 60.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
2019 Regular Season role shape
pass-led usage with 48.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2020 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Virginia Tech, Maryland.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Howard
Win with 245 yards of offense and 82.5 efficiency. It landed in the 90th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
10
Primary Metric / G
122.1
Efficiency
48.4
Usage
18.6
Consistency
53.4
Best Game by takeover score
Howard
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Howard: 245. Syracuse: 302. Temple: 163. Penn State: 67. Rutgers: 173. Minnesota: 0. Michigan: 65. Ohio State: 15. Nebraska: 42. Michigan State: 149
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Howard: 24 by 82.5. Syracuse: 42 by 56.2. Temple: 48 by 42.3. Penn State: 32 by 34.3. Rutgers: 19 by 62.4. Minnesota: 2 by 33.3. Michigan: 27 by 41.4. Ohio State: 12 by 44.2. Nebraska: 18 by 42.8. Michigan State: 36 by 44.6
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.