Usage Score
3.9
Player Dossier
2017-2021Virginia Tech
Khalil Ladler
DB • 5'11" • 190 lbs • Stone Mountain, GA, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Khalil Ladler shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 21.6 disruption score.
Efficiency
21.6
Consistency
12.1
Season Value
11.4
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason · Virginia Tech
171718181919202021
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 9
- Program Path
- Virginia Tech • Louisiana Tech
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Notre Dame
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Khalil Ladler, DB. Best season Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason · Virginia Tech. Khalil Ladler shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 21.6 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason
Virginia Tech paired 2.5 primary output with 16.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2021 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with 21.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2021 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Virginia Tech, Louisiana Tech.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Charlotte
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2021 Regular Season · Louisiana Tech
Games
11
Havoc Plays / G
0.5
Efficiency
21.6
Usage
3.9
Consistency
12.1
Best Game by takeover score
Rice
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
1234567891011
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Mississippi State: 0. Unknown: 0. SMU: 0. North Texas: 1. NC State: 0. UTEP: 1. Old Dominion: 0. UAB: 0. Charlotte: 2. Southern Miss: 0. Rice: 1
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Mississippi State: 3 by 12.5. Unknown: 3 by 12.5. SMU: 6 by 25. North Texas: 5 by 30.8. NC State: 3 by 12.5. UTEP: 6 by 35. Old Dominion: 7 by 29.2. UAB: 3 by 12.5. Charlotte: 3 by 32.5. Southern Miss: 2 by 8.3. Rice: 4 by 26.7
Split Comparison
Wins1.5 · n=2 · +1.3 vs Losses
Losses0.3 · n=8 · -1.3 vs Wins
First Half0.3 · n=6 · -0.3 vs Second Half
Second Half0.6 · n=5 · +0.3 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Charlotte
Best efficiency game
35 vs UTEP
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/27 | @ Rice | L 31-35 | 4 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 11/20 | vs Southern Miss | L 19-35 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/13 | vs Charlotte | W 42-32 | 3 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 11/6 | @ UAB | L 38-52 | 3 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/30 | @ Old Dominion | L 20-23 | 7 | 7 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 10/17 | @ UTEP | L 3-19 | 6 | 5 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/2 | @ NC State | L 27-34 | 3 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/25 | vs North Texas | W 24-17 | 5 | 4 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/18 | vs SMU | L 37-39 | 6 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/11 | vs Unknown | — | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/4 | @ Mississippi State | L 34-35 | 3 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Virginia Tech
2017-2019
Opening stop
- 2
Louisiana Tech
2020-2021
Final stop
Season Progression
201720172018201820192019202020202021
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 Postseason | Virginia Tech | 2.5 | 16.7 | 4.1 | — |
| 2017 Regular Season | Virginia Tech | 2.5 | 16.7 | 4.1 | 0 |
| 2018 Postseason | Virginia Tech | 7.5 | 31.8 | 7.5 | 5 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Virginia Tech | 7.5 | 31.8 | 7.5 | 0 |
| 2019 Postseason | Virginia Tech | 1 | 9.5 | 1.5 | -6.5 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Virginia Tech | 1 | 9.5 | 1.5 | 0 |
| 2020 Postseason | Louisiana Tech | 1.5 | 17.4 | 3.7 | 0.5 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Louisiana Tech | 1.5 | 17.4 | 3.7 | 0 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Louisiana Tech | 5 | 21.6 | 3.9 | 3.5 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Notre Dame
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2
Primary metric
2 disruption/tackle impact with 59 takeover score.
#2
UTSA
1
Primary metric
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 49.1 takeover score.
#3
Charlotte
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 47.3 takeover score.
#4
Florida State
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 44.2 takeover score.
#5
East Carolina
1.5
Primary metric
Win with 1.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1.5 disruption/tackle impact with 43.7 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2017 Postseason · Virginia Tech
2.5 primary output · 16.7 efficiency · 4.1 usage
17
#2
2017 Regular Season · Virginia Tech
17
2.5 primary · 16.7 efficiency · 4.1 usage
#3
2018 Postseason · Virginia Tech
16.6
7.5 primary · 31.8 efficiency · 7.5 usage
Milestones
0
Impact games
0
Splash games
1
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2016 · Rating 0.8758
IMG Academy · Bradenton, FL
- Committed To
- Virginia Tech
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2016
Career Facts
2
Career teams
9
Seasons tracked
173
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 9 tracked seasons, 44 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.