Player Stats

Myles Dorn College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
240
TFL
10.5
QB hurries
3
Passes defended
15

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2016 PostseasonNorth Carolina104-0--015.2
2016 Regular SeasonNorth Carolina102810-1015.2
2017 Regular SeasonNorth Carolina12712.5015048.4
2018 Regular SeasonNorth Carolina8542.5013055.8
2019 PostseasonNorth Carolina135-0-2063.1
2019 Regular SeasonNorth Carolina13784.5014063.1

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason

North Carolina paired 13.5 primary output with 37 efficiency.

Supporting note

2019 Postseason role shape

impact-led usage with 37 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2019 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Wake Forest

Loss with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2019 Postseason · North Carolina

Games

13

Havoc Plays / G

1.0

Efficiency

37

Usage

7.8

Consistency

50

Best Game by takeover score

Wake Forest

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678910111213

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Temple: 2. South Carolina: 0. Miami: 0. Wake Forest: 4. App State: 2. Clemson: 0. Georgia Tech: 0. Virginia Tech: 1. Duke: 0. Virginia: 1.5. Pittsburgh: 2. Mercer: 0. NC State: 1

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Temple: 5 by 40.8. South Carolina: 7 by 29.2. Miami: 10 by 41.7. Wake Forest: 5 by 60.8. App State: 12 by 70. Clemson: 3 by 12.5. Georgia Tech: 6 by 25. Virginia Tech: 12 by 60. Duke: 5 by 20.8. Virginia: 6 by 40. Pittsburgh: 5 by 40.8. Mercer: 3 by 12.5. NC State: 4 by 26.7

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins0.4 · Games = 7 · -1.3 vs Losses
Losses1.8 · Games = 6 · +1.3 vs Wins