Player Stats

Shaquille Quarterman College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
351
TFL
46.5
Sacks
12.5
QB hurries
25
Passes defended
11

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2016 PostseasonMiami13511--070.8
2016 Regular SeasonMiami13799281070.8
2017 PostseasonMiami12710-1052.4
2017 Regular SeasonMiami127162.542052.4
2018 PostseasonMiami13610--073.6
2018 Regular SeasonMiami137613662073.6
2019 PostseasonMiami1311-0--078.7
2019 Regular SeasonMiami139615.5175078.7

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason

Miami paired 28.5 primary output with 55.3 efficiency.

Supporting note

2019 Postseason role shape

impact-led usage with 55.3 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2019 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Georgia Tech

Loss with 5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2019 Postseason · Miami

Games

13

Havoc Plays / G

2.2

Efficiency

55.3

Usage

12.5

Consistency

61.2

Best Game by takeover score

Georgia Tech

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678910111213

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Louisiana Tech: 0. Florida: 0. North Carolina: 4. Bethune-Cookman: 2. Central Michigan: 3. Virginia Tech: 0. Virginia: 2. Georgia Tech: 5. Pittsburgh: 3. Florida State: 3.5. Louisville: 4. Florida International: 2. Duke: 0

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Louisiana Tech: 11 by 45.8. Florida: 4 by 16.7. North Carolina: 6 by 65. Bethune-Cookman: 2 by 28.3. Central Michigan: 14 by 80. Virginia Tech: 6 by 25. Virginia: 6 by 45. Georgia Tech: 13 by 100. Pittsburgh: 12 by 80. Florida State: 9 by 72.5. Louisville: 6 by 65. Florida International: 12 by 70. Duke: 6 by 25

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins2.9 · Games = 6 · +1.3 vs Losses
Losses1.6 · Games = 7 · -1.3 vs Wins