Player Stats

Michael Pinckney College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
264
TFL
42
Sacks
14.5
QB hurries
13
Passes defended
9

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2016 PostseasonMiami13410--049.7
2016 Regular SeasonMiami13576.52.522049.7
2017 PostseasonMiami12510--054
2017 Regular SeasonMiami1260103.512054
2018 PostseasonMiami1251.51--070
2018 Regular SeasonMiami12699.52.552070
2019 Regular SeasonMiami116412.5553075

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2019 Regular Season

Miami paired 25.5 primary output with 47.4 efficiency.

Supporting note

2019 Regular Season role shape

impact-led usage with 47.4 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value is trending up

2019 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Louisville

Win with 5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2019 Regular Season · Miami

Games

11

Havoc Plays / G

2.3

Efficiency

47.4

Usage

11.2

Consistency

59.1

Best Game by takeover score

Louisville

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

1234567891011

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Florida: 0. North Carolina: 3.5. Bethune-Cookman: 0. Central Michigan: 2. Virginia Tech: 3. Virginia: 5. Georgia Tech: 2. Florida State: 1. Louisville: 5. Florida International: 1. Duke: 3

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Florida: 3 by 12.5. North Carolina: 8 by 68.3. Bethune-Cookman: 3 by 12.5. Central Michigan: 5 by 40.8. Virginia Tech: 11 by 75.8. Virginia: 6 by 75. Georgia Tech: 2 by 28.3. Florida State: 4 by 26.7. Louisville: 8 by 83.3. Florida International: 4 by 26.7. Duke: 10 by 71.7

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins2.6 · Games = 5 · +0.5 vs Losses
Losses2.1 · Games = 6 · -0.5 vs Wins