Usage Score
19.2
Player Dossier
2016-2019Middle Tennessee
WR • 5'9" • 186 lbs • Moultrie, GA, USA
Ty Lee reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
19.2
Efficiency
62.5
Consistency
46.6
Season Value
44.2
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason · Middle Tennessee
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Ty Lee, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason · Middle Tennessee. Ty Lee reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason
Middle Tennessee paired 955 primary output with 70.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
2019 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 62.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2019 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Rice
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
41.9
Efficiency
62.5
Usage
19.2
Consistency
46.6
Best Game by takeover score
Western Kentucky
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Michigan: 52. Unknown: 64. Duke: 19. Iowa: 16. Marshall: 22. Florida Atlantic: 45. North Texas: 29. Florida International: 9. Charlotte: 3. Rice: 154. Old Dominion: 39. Western Kentucky: 51
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Michigan: 4 by 86.7. Unknown: 5 by 85.3. Duke: 3 by 42.2. Iowa: 2 by 53.3. Marshall: 3 by 48.9. Florida Atlantic: 8 by 37.5. North Texas: 3 by 64.4. Florida International: 1 by 60. Charlotte: 1 by 20. Rice: 7 by 100. Old Dominion: 5 by 52. Western Kentucky: 3 by 100
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Rice
Best efficiency game
100 vs Western Kentucky
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/30 | @ Western Kentucky | L 26-31 | — | 3 | 51 | 13.3 | 17 | 1 | 33 |
| Sat 11/23 | vs Old Dominion | W 38-17 | — | 5 | 39 | 7.8 | 7.80 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 11/16 | vs Rice100 receiving yards | L 28-31 | — | 7 | 154 | 19.6 | 22 | 1 | 90 |
| Sat 11/2 | @ Charlotte | L 20-34 | — | 1 | 3 | 6.4 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| Sat 10/26 | vs Florida International | W 50-17 | — | 1 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 10/19 | @ North Texas | L 30-33 | — | 3 | 29 | 9.7 | 9.70 | 0 | 19 |
| Sat 10/12 | @ Florida AtlanticHigh volume | L 13-28 | — | 8 | 45 | 5.6 | 5.60 | 0 | 19 |
| Sat 10/5 | vs Marshall | W 24-13 | — | 3 | 22 | 7.3 | 7.30 | 0 | 8 |
| Sat 9/28 | @ Iowa | L 3-48 | — | 2 | 16 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 9/14 | vs Duke | L 18-41 | — | 3 | 19 | 6.3 | 6.30 | 0 | 8 |
| Sat 9/7 | vs Unknown | — | — | 5 | 64 | 12.8 | 12.80 | 1 | 22 |
| Sat 8/31 | @ Michigan | L 21-40 | — | 4 | 52 | 13 | 13 | 0 | 18 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Middle Tennessee
2016-2019
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 Postseason | Middle Tennessee | 699 | 73.2 | 18.4 | — |
| 2016 Regular Season | Middle Tennessee | 699 | 73.2 | 18.4 | 0 |
| 2017 Postseason | Middle Tennessee | 955 | 70.8 | 28.5 | 256 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Middle Tennessee | 955 | 70.8 | 28.5 | 0 |
| 2018 Postseason | Middle Tennessee | 883 | 74.8 | 21.9 | -72 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Middle Tennessee | 883 | 74.8 | 21.9 | 0 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Middle Tennessee | 503 | 62.5 | 19.2 | -380 |
#1 Featured game
Rice
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
154
Primary metric
154 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
UTEP
158
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
158 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Florida International
100
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
100 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Florida Atlantic
136
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
136 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Charlotte
121
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
121 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2017 Postseason · Middle Tennessee
955 primary output · 70.8 efficiency · 28.5 usage
66.3
#2
2017 Regular Season · Middle Tennessee
66.3
955 primary · 70.8 efficiency · 28.5 usage
#3
2018 Postseason · Middle Tennessee
63.2
883 primary · 74.8 efficiency · 21.9 usage
8
100+ receiving yards
7
8+ catch outings
3
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2023 · Rating 0.837
St. Edward · Lakewood, OH
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
3,040
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 52 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Ty Lee quick answers
Recruiting profile
3-star recruit