Usage Score
7.5
Player Dossier
2016-2017Middle Tennessee
QB • 6'2" • 195 lbs • Acworth, GA, USA
Kyle Banks is a balanced quarterback profile with 7.5 usage in the latest tracked season.
Usage Score
7.5
Efficiency
37.3
Consistency
42.9
Season Value
46.5
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season · Middle Tennessee
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Kyle Banks, QB. Best season Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season · Middle Tennessee. Kyle Banks is a balanced quarterback profile with 7.5 usage in the latest tracked season.
Kyle Banks played QB for Middle Tennessee. Across 2 tracked seasons, Kyle Banks recorded 49 passing yards, 12 rushing yards, and 1 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2017 with Middle Tennessee.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season
Middle Tennessee paired 0 primary output with — efficiency.
Supporting note
2017 Regular Season role shape
pass-led usage with 37.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2017 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Minnesota
Loss with 43 yards of offense and 56.5 efficiency. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
4
Primary Metric / G
15.3
Efficiency
37.3
Usage
7.5
Consistency
42.9
Best Game by takeover score
Charlotte
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Minnesota: 43. Marshall: -6. UTEP: 23. Charlotte: 1
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Minnesota: 10 by 56.5. Marshall: 4 by 25. UTEP: 4 by 57.5. Charlotte: 1 by 10
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
4 games
Featured metric
Total Offense
Top game by takeover score
Minnesota
Best efficiency game
57.5 vs UTEP
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Middle Tennessee
2016-2017
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 Regular Season | Middle Tennessee | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2017 Regular Season | Middle Tennessee | 61 | 37.3 | 7.5 | 61 |
#1 Featured game
Minnesota
Loss with 43 yards of offense and 56.5 efficiency.
43
Primary metric
43 total offense with 56.5 efficiency.
#2
UTEP
23
Primary metric
Win with 23 yards of offense and 57.5 efficiency.
23 total offense with 57.5 efficiency.
#3
Marshall
-6
Primary metric
Loss with -6 yards of offense and 25 efficiency.
-6 total offense with 25 efficiency.
#4
Charlotte
1
Primary metric
Win with 1 yards of offense and 10 efficiency.
1 total offense with 10 efficiency.
#5
Missouri
0
Primary metric
Win with 0 yards of offense and 0 efficiency.
0 total offense with — efficiency.
#1 Season by value score
2016 Regular Season · Middle Tennessee
0 primary output · — efficiency · — usage
100
#2
2017 Regular Season · Middle Tennessee
46.5
61 primary · 37.3 efficiency · 7.5 usage
0
250+ passing yards
0
300+ total offense
0
3+ takeover TD games
0
Above avg efficiency
Recruit Profile
Class 2016 · Rating 0.8081
North Paulding · Dallas, GA
Career Facts
1
Career teams
2
Seasons tracked
61
Career Total Offense
Data Context
Coverage spans 2 tracked seasons, 5 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.