Player Stats

Brandon Adams College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
41
TFL
6.5
QB hurries
1
Passes defended
1

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2015 Regular SeasonGeorgia Tech00-0--0-
2016 Regular SeasonGeorgia Tech570.50--010.8
2017 Regular SeasonGeorgia Tech7101011026
2018 PostseasonGeorgia Tech122-0--041.3
2018 Regular SeasonGeorgia Tech122250--041.3
2019 Regular SeasonGeorgia Tech00-0--0-

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason

Georgia Tech paired 5 primary output with 12.5 efficiency.

Supporting note

2018 Postseason role shape

impact-led usage with 12.5 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value cooled off

2019 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Georgia

Loss with 1.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2018 Postseason · Georgia Tech

Games

12

Havoc Plays / G

0.4

Efficiency

12.5

Usage

4.7

Consistency

13.9

Best Game by takeover score

Georgia

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456789101112

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Minnesota: 0. Alcorn State: 1. Pittsburgh: 0. Clemson: 0. Bowling Green: 0. Louisville: 1. Duke: 1. Virginia Tech: 0. North Carolina: 0.5. Miami: 0. Virginia: 0. Georgia: 1.5

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Minnesota: 2 by 8.3. Alcorn State: 2 by 18.3. Pittsburgh: 2 by 8.3. Clemson: 2 by 8.3. Bowling Green: 3 by 12.5. Louisville: 1 by 14.2. Duke: 3 by 22.5. Virginia Tech: 1 by 4.2. North Carolina: 1 by 9.2. Miami: 1 by 4.2. Virginia: 1 by 4.2. Georgia: 5 by 35.8

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins0.4 · Games = 7 · -0.1 vs Losses
Losses0.5 · Games = 5 · +0.1 vs Wins