Player Stats

Carlos Basham Jr. College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
173
TFL
36.5
Sacks
20.5
QB hurries
23
Passes defended
8
Touchdowns
1

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2017 PostseasonWake Forest1110.50--025.7
2017 Regular SeasonWake Forest11231.5033025.7
2018 PostseasonWake Forest12511--063.4
2018 Regular SeasonWake Forest1259103.551163.4
2019 PostseasonWake Forest13411-1082.5
2019 Regular SeasonWake Forest13531710132082.5
2020 Regular SeasonWake Forest6285.5521063.6

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason

Wake Forest paired 45 primary output with 52.1 efficiency.

Supporting note

2020 Regular Season role shape

impact-led usage with 41.9 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value cooled off

2020 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Campbell

Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2020 Regular Season · Wake Forest

Games

6

Havoc Plays / G

2.3

Efficiency

41.9

Usage

12.9

Consistency

82.5

Best Game by takeover score

Campbell

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Clemson: 3. NC State: 2. Campbell: 3. Virginia: 2. Virginia Tech: 2. North Carolina: 1.5

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Clemson: 2 by 38.3. NC State: 5 by 40.8. Campbell: 4 by 46.7. Virginia: 6 by 45. Virginia Tech: 9 by 57.5. North Carolina: 2 by 23.3

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins2.3 · Games = 3 · +0.2 vs Losses
Losses2.2 · Games = 3 · -0.2 vs Wins