Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason
Wake Forest paired 45 primary output with 52.1 efficiency.
Player Stats
Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.
Stat Footprint
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Tackles | TFL | Sacks | QB Hur | PD | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 Postseason | Wake Forest | 11 | 1 | 0.5 | 0 | - | - | 0 | 25.7 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Wake Forest | 11 | 23 | 1.5 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 25.7 |
| 2018 Postseason | Wake Forest | 12 | 5 | 1 | 1 | - | - | 0 | 63.4 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Wake Forest | 12 | 59 | 10 | 3.5 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 63.4 |
| 2019 Postseason | Wake Forest | 13 | 4 | 1 | 1 | - | 1 | 0 | 82.5 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Wake Forest | 13 | 53 | 17 | 10 | 13 | 2 | 0 | 82.5 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Wake Forest | 6 | 28 | 5.5 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 63.6 |
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason
Wake Forest paired 45 primary output with 52.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
2020 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with 41.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2020 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Campbell
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
6
Havoc Plays / G
2.3
Efficiency
41.9
Usage
12.9
Consistency
82.5
Best Game by takeover score
Campbell
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Clemson: 3. NC State: 2. Campbell: 3. Virginia: 2. Virginia Tech: 2. North Carolina: 1.5
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Clemson: 2 by 38.3. NC State: 5 by 40.8. Campbell: 4 by 46.7. Virginia: 6 by 45. Virginia Tech: 9 by 57.5. North Carolina: 2 by 23.3
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.