Player Dossier

2017-2021

Old Dominion

Brandon Chapman

TE • 6'5" • 243 lbs • Grove City, OH, USA

Reliable chain-moverPossession profile

Brandon Chapman reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.

Usage Score

7.8

Efficiency

52.1

Consistency

64.7

Season Value

53.3

Career Arc

Value trend by season

Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason · Wake Forest

17181819192020212121

Snapshot

Career Teams
2
Seasons Tracked
10
Program Path
Wake Forest • Old Dominion
Peak Game
Peak game by takeover score: Wisconsin

Scouting Read

Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.

Brandon Chapman, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason · Wake Forest. Brandon Chapman reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.

Brandon Chapman played TE for Wake Forest and Old Dominion. Across 5 tracked seasons, Brandon Chapman recorded 341 receiving yards, 1 tackles, and 3 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2019 with Wake Forest.

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason

Wake Forest paired 100 primary output with 60.5 efficiency.

Supporting note

2021 Postseason role shape

target-driven usage with 52.1 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2021 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Multi-stop career journey

Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Wake Forest, Old Dominion.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Duke

Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 85.7th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2021 Postseason · Wake Forest

Games

8

Receiving Yards / G

10.6

Efficiency

52.1

Usage

7.8

Consistency

64.7

Best Game by takeover score

Rutgers

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Rutgers: 5. Wake Forest: 0. Florida State: 9. Louisville: 7. Duke: 16. NC State: 23. Clemson: 11. Boston College: 14

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Rutgers: 2 by 16.7. Florida State: 2 by 30. Louisville: 1 by 46.7. Duke: 1 by 100. NC State: 3 by 51.1. Clemson: 1 by 73.3. Boston College: 2 by 46.7

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins12.3 · Games = 6 · +6.8 vs Losses
Losses5.5 · Games = 2 · -6.8 vs Wins
First Half5.3 · Games = 4 · -10.8 vs Second Half
Second Half16 · Games = 4 · +10.8 vs First Half

Game Log

Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.

8 games

Featured metric

Receiving Yards

Top game by takeover score

Duke

Best efficiency game

100 vs Duke

Result
Fri 12/31@ Rutgers2+ TDW 38-10252.52.5024
Sat 11/27@ Boston CollegeW 41-1021477010
Sat 11/20@ ClemsonL 27-481111111011
Sun 11/14vs NC StateW 45-423237.77.70111
Sat 10/30vs DukeW 45-71161616016
Sat 10/2vs LouisvilleW 37-34177707
Sat 9/18vs Florida StateW 35-14294.54.5008
Fri 9/3@ Wake ForestL 10-42

Career Arc

Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.

  1. 1

    Wake Forest

    2017-2021

    Opening stop

  2. 2

    Old Dominion

    2021

    Final stop

Season Progression

2017201820182019201920202020202120212021
SeasonTeamPrimaryEfficiencyUsageDelta
2017 Regular SeasonWake Forest0
2018 PostseasonWake Forest91508.691
2018 Regular SeasonWake Forest91508.60
2019 PostseasonWake Forest10060.56.49
2019 Regular SeasonWake Forest10060.56.40
2020 PostseasonWake Forest6566.76.5-35
2020 Regular SeasonWake Forest6566.76.50
2021 PostseasonWake Forest8552.17.820
2021 Regular SeasonWake Forest8552.17.80
2021 Regular SeasonOld Dominion8552.17.80

Signature Performances

Top Games

#1 Featured game

Wisconsin

Loss with an explosive receiving profile.

40

Primary metric

40 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.

#2

Pittsburgh

36

Primary metric

Loss with an explosive receiving profile.

36 receiving yards with a 80 efficiency score.

#3

NC State

22

Primary metric

Win with an explosive receiving profile.

22 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.

#4

Duke

16

Primary metric

Win with an explosive receiving profile.

16 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.

#5

NC State

23

Primary metric

Win with an explosive receiving profile.

23 receiving yards with a 51.1 efficiency score.

Top Seasons

#1 Season by value score

2019 Postseason · Wake Forest

100 primary output · 60.5 efficiency · 6.4 usage

56

#2

2019 Regular Season · Wake Forest

56

100 primary · 60.5 efficiency · 6.4 usage

#3

2021 Postseason · Wake Forest

53.3

85 primary · 52.1 efficiency · 7.8 usage

Milestones

0

100+ receiving yards

0

8+ catch outings

1

2+ TD games

Bio, Recruit, and Data Context

Recruit Profile

3★

Class 2016 · Rating 0.8458

Grove City · Grove City, OH

Committed To
Wake Forest
Commit Date
Jan 1, 2016

Career Facts

2

Career teams

10

Seasons tracked

341

Career Receiving Yards

Data Context

Coverage spans 10 tracked seasons, 27 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.