Usage Score
12.2
Player Dossier
2016-2019Army
LB • 6'2" • 225 lbs • Suffolk, VA, USA
Cole Christiansen shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 43 disruption score.
Usage Score
12.2
Efficiency
43
Consistency
13.9
Season Value
18.8
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason · Army
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Cole Christiansen, LB. Best season Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason · Army. Cole Christiansen shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 43 disruption score.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason
Army paired 0 primary output with 2.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
2019 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with 43 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2019 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Navy
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
12
Havoc Plays / G
0.6
Efficiency
43
Usage
12.2
Consistency
13.9
Best Game by takeover score
Navy
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Rice: 0. Michigan: 0. UTSA: 2. Unknown: 0. Tulane: 0. Western Kentucky: 1. Georgia State: 0. San José State: 1. Air Force: 1. Unknown: 0. Hawai'i: 0. Navy: 2
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Rice: 7 by 29.2. Michigan: 12 by 50. UTSA: 9 by 57.5. Unknown: 11 by 45.8. Tulane: 10 by 41.7. Western Kentucky: 13 by 60. Georgia State: 8 by 33.3. San José State: 3 by 22.5. Air Force: 16 by 60. Unknown: 10 by 41.7. Hawai'i: 4 by 16.7. Navy: 9 by 57.5
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Navy
Best efficiency game
60 vs Air Force
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/14 | @ Navy | L 7-31 | 9 | 2 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 12/1 | @ Hawai'i | L 31-52 | 4 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/16 | vs Unknown10+ tackles | — | 10 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/2 | @ Air Force10+ tackles | L 13-17 | 16 | 7 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/26 | vs San José State | L 29-34 | 3 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/19 | @ Georgia State | L 21-28 | 8 | 7 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/12 | @ Western Kentucky10+ tackles | L 8-17 | 13 | 7 | — | 0.50 | 0.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/5 | vs Tulane10+ tackles | L 33-42 | 10 | 8 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/21 | vs Unknown10+ tackles | — | 11 | 6 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/14 | @ UTSA | W 31-13 | 9 | 6 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/7 | @ Michigan10+ tackles | L 21-24 | 12 | 7 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Fri 8/30 | vs Rice | W 14-7 | 7 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Army
2016-2019
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 Postseason | Army | 0 | 2.8 | 0.5 | — |
| 2016 Regular Season | Army | 0 | 2.8 | 0.5 | 0 |
| 2017 Postseason | Army | 7 | 32.3 | 8.2 | 7 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Army | 7 | 32.3 | 8.2 | 0 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Army | 15 | 36.8 | 17.1 | 8 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Army | 7 | 43 | 12.2 | -8 |
#1 Featured game
Miami (OH)
Win with 3.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3.5
Primary metric
3.5 disruption/tackle impact with 73.7 takeover score.
#2
Navy
2
Primary metric
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 65.4 takeover score.
#3
UTSA
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 57.2 takeover score.
#4
Unknown
3
Primary metric
Game with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 56 takeover score.
#5
Eastern Michigan
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 45.5 takeover score.
#1 Season by value score
2016 Postseason · Army
0 primary output · 2.8 efficiency · 0.5 usage
34.4
#2
2016 Regular Season · Army
34.4
0 primary · 2.8 efficiency · 0.5 usage
#3
2018 Regular Season · Army
32.9
15 primary · 36.8 efficiency · 17.1 usage
2
Impact games
2
Splash games
9
10+ tackle games
Recruit Profile
Class 2016 · Rating 0.7667
Nansemond-Suffolk Academy · Suffolk, VA
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
269
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 40 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Cole Christiansen quick answers
Recruiting profile
2-star recruit