Usage / Role
2%
Rotational offensive role
lowfeatured
Player Dossier
2016-2019Army
Kjetil Cline
WR • 6'0" • 205 lbs • Woodbury, MN, USA
Alpha targetPossession profile
Kjetil Cline reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Impact Production
7
Developing production for a receiver
lowelite
Reliability
14
Sporadic game-to-game production
lowhigh
Star Power
17
Limited ceiling signals so far
limitedstar
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2018 Postseason · Army
161717181819
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Unique Seasons
- 4
- Program Path
- Army
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Houston
3★
- Committed To
- Army
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2016
Kjetil Cline, WR. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2018 Postseason · Army. Kjetil Cline reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Stat Footprint
Career production snapshot
- Receiving yards
- 101
- Receptions
- 8
Quick Answers
Kjetil Cline quick answers
- Latest team and position
- Army · WR
- Career Receiving Yards
- 101
- Tracked sample
- 4 unique seasons · 6 entries · 10 games
- Best season
- 2018 Postseason · Army
- Top game
- Houston
- Recruit profile
- 3-star · IMG Academy · Army
- High school pipeline
- IMG Academy · 130 FBS recruits · 13 drafted players
- Latest roster
- No. 82 · Senior
- 2019 Receiving yards rank
- 23 receiving yards · WR 866th (top 85%) · FBS Independents 70th (top 74%) · National 1,522nd (top 77%)
Season Ledger
Crawlable season-by-season stats
| Season | Team | Games | Rec | Rec Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 Regular Season | Army | 0 | - | 0 | 0 | - |
| 2017 Postseason | Army | 3 | - | 0 | 0 | 46 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Army | 3 | 1 | 9 | 0 | 46 |
| 2018 Postseason | Army | 3 | 1 | 54 | 0 | 65.6 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Army | 3 | 2 | 15 | 0 | 65.6 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Army | 4 | 4 | 23 | 0 | 64 |
Related Context
Keep exploring Kjetil Cline
Kjetil Cline played WR for Army. Across 4 tracked seasons, Kjetil Cline recorded 23 rushing yards and 101 receiving yards. His top tracked season came in 2018 with Army.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason
Army paired 69 primary output with 66.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2019 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 38.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2019 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Navy
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2019 Regular Season · Army
Games
4
Receiving Yards / G
5.8
Efficiency
38.3
Usage
27.2
Consistency
93.7
Best Game by takeover score
Navy
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. UTSA: 6. San José State: 5. Air Force: 5. Navy: 7
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. UTSA: 1 by 40. San José State: 1 by 33.3. Air Force: 1 by 33.3. Navy: 1 by 46.7
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins6 · Games = 1 · +0.3 vs Losses
Losses5.7 · Games = 3 · -0.3 vs Wins
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
4 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Navy
Best efficiency game
46.7 vs Navy
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Army
2016-2019
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
201620172017201820182019
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 Regular Season | Army | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2017 Postseason | Army | 9 | 60 | 100 | 9 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Army | 9 | 60 | 100 | 0 |
| 2018 Postseason | Army | 69 | 66.7 | 21.4 | 60 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Army | 69 | 66.7 | 21.4 | 0 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Army | 23 | 38.3 | 27.2 | -46 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
vs Houston
Week 1 · W 70-14 · Postseason
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
54
Receiving Yards
94.4 takeover
54 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
@ Rice
Week 6 · W 49-12
9
Receiving Yards
86.7 takeover
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
9 receiving yards with a 60 efficiency score.
#3
@ Navy
Week 15 · L 7-31
7
Receiving Yards
82.2 takeover
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
7 receiving yards with a 46.7 efficiency score.
#4
@ UTSA
Week 3 · W 31-13
6
Receiving Yards
75.2 takeover
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
6 receiving yards with a 40 efficiency score.
#5
vs San José State
Week 9 · L 29-34
5
Receiving Yards
50.8 takeover
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
5 receiving yards with a 33.3 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by Season Value
2018 Postseason · Army
69 primary output · 66.7 efficiency · 21.4 usage
65.6
#2
2018 Regular Season · Army
65.6
69 primary · 66.7 efficiency · 21.4 usage
#3
2019 Regular Season · Army
64
23 primary · 38.3 efficiency · 27.2 usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Next best actions
Keep exploring Kjetil Cline
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.