Usage Score
19.3
Player Dossier
2017-2020Georgia Southern
Darion Anderson
WR • 6'0" • 200 lbs • Warner Robins, GA, USA
Reliable chain-moverPossession profile
Darion Anderson reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
67.1
Consistency
49.5
Season Value
47.2
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason · Georgia Southern
1718181920
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- Georgia Southern
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: App State
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Darion Anderson, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason · Georgia Southern. Darion Anderson reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Darion Anderson played WR for Georgia Southern. Across 4 tracked seasons, Darion Anderson recorded 21 rushing yards, 474 receiving yards, and 3 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2018 with Georgia Southern.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason
Georgia Southern paired 160 primary output with 86.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2020 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 67.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2020 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Army
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2020 Regular Season · Georgia Southern
Games
8
Receiving Yards / G
11.5
Efficiency
67.1
Usage
19.3
Consistency
49.5
Best Game by takeover score
Florida Atlantic
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Louisiana: 11. UL Monroe: 7. Massachusetts: 4. Coastal Carolina: 0. South Alabama: 22. Troy: 14. Army: 29. Florida Atlantic: 5
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Louisiana: 1 by 73.3. UL Monroe: 1 by 46.7. Massachusetts: 1 by 26.7. South Alabama: 1 by 100. Troy: 1 by 93.3. Army: 2 by 96.7. Florida Atlantic: 1 by 33.3
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins10.4 · Games = 5 · -2.9 vs Losses
Losses13.3 · Games = 3 · +2.9 vs Wins
First Half5.5 · Games = 4 · -12 vs Second Half
Second Half17.5 · Games = 4 · +12 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
8 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Army
Best efficiency game
100 vs South Alabama
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/5 | vs Florida Atlantic | W 20-3 | — | 1 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 5 |
| Sat 11/21 | @ Army | L 27-28 | — | 2 | 29 | 14.5 | 14.50 | 0 | 19 |
| Sat 11/7 | vs Troy | W 20-13 | — | 1 | 14 | 14 | 14 | 0 | 14 |
| Thu 10/29 | vs South Alabama | W 24-17 | — | 1 | 22 | 22 | 22 | 0 | 22 |
| Sat 10/24 | @ Coastal Carolina | L 14-28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/17 | vs Massachusetts | W 41-0 | — | 1 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 4 |
| Sat 10/3 | @ UL Monroe | W 35-30 | — | 1 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 7 |
| Sat 9/26 | @ Louisiana | L 18-20 | — | 1 | 11 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 11 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Georgia Southern
2017-2020
Opening stop
Season Progression
20172018201820192020
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 Regular Season | Georgia Southern | 106 | 66.7 | 13.9 | — |
| 2018 Postseason | Georgia Southern | 160 | 86.7 | 36.7 | 54 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Georgia Southern | 160 | 86.7 | 36.7 | 0 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Georgia Southern | 116 | 95 | 16.1 | -44 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Georgia Southern | 92 | 67.1 | 19.3 | -24 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
App State
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
57
Primary metric
57 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Unknown
45
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
45 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
South Alabama
58
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
58 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Army
29
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
29 receiving yards with a 96.7 efficiency score.
#5
South Alabama
71
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
71 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2018 Postseason · Georgia Southern
160 primary output · 86.7 efficiency · 36.7 usage
65.5
#2
2018 Regular Season · Georgia Southern
65.5
160 primary · 86.7 efficiency · 36.7 usage
#3
2019 Regular Season · Georgia Southern
63.9
116 primary · 95 efficiency · 16.1 usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2016 · Rating 0.8751
Houston County · Warner Robins, GA
- Committed To
- Georgia Southern
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2016
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
474
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 23 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.