Usage Score
32.6
Player Dossier
2016-2019Georgia State
Tra Barnett
RB • 5'10" • 185 lbs • Elberton, GA, USA
Workhorse runnerSteady chain mover
Tra Barnett leans workhorse runner traits and 58.8 efficiency.
Efficiency
58.8
Consistency
69.9
Season Value
65.3
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason · Georgia State
161717181919
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- Georgia State
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Coastal Carolina
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Tra Barnett, RB. Best season Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason · Georgia State. Tra Barnett leans workhorse runner traits and 58.8 efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason
Georgia State paired 1,522 primary output with 58.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
2019 Postseason role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 58.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2019 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Troy
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2019 Postseason · Georgia State
Games
13
Scrimmage Yards / G
117.1
Efficiency
58.8
Usage
32.6
Consistency
69.9
Best Game by takeover score
Wyoming
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Wyoming: 67. Tennessee: 107. Unknown: 52. Western Michigan: 137. Texas State: 55. Arkansas State: 149. Coastal Carolina: 113. Army: 110. Troy: 244. UL Monroe: 190. App State: 93. South Alabama: 138. Georgia Southern: 67
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Wyoming: 17 by 43.1. Tennessee: 22 by 48.5. Unknown: 9 by 60.2. Western Michigan: 21 by 69. Texas State: 12 by 47.7. Arkansas State: 16 by 88.8. Coastal Carolina: 21 by 56.8. Army: 18 by 65.2. Troy: 35 by 73.5. UL Monroe: 32 by 61.8. App State: 20 by 52.5. South Alabama: 24 by 58.7. Georgia Southern: 17 by 38.5
Split Comparison
Wins143.5 · n=6 · +42 vs Losses
Losses101.5 · n=6 · -42 vs Wins
First Half97.1 · n=7 · -43.2 vs Second Half
Second Half140.3 · n=6 · +43.2 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
Troy
Best efficiency game
88.8 vs Arkansas State
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tue 12/31 | vs Wyoming | L 17-38 | 15 | 64 | 4.30 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 3.9 |
| Sat 11/30 | @ Georgia Southern | L 10-38 | 15 | 53 | 3.50 | 1 | 2 | 14 | 3.9 |
| Sat 11/23 | vs South Alabama100 rush yards | W 28-15 | 23 | 128 | 5.60 | 1 | 1 | 10 | 5.8 |
| Sun 11/17 | vs App State | L 27-56 | 17 | 90 | 5.30 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 4.7 |
| Sat 11/9 | @ UL Monroe100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | L 31-45 | 32 | 190 | 5.90 | 2 | — | — | 5.9 |
| Sat 10/26 | vs Troy100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | W 52-33 | 34 | 242 | 7.10 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 7.0 |
| Sat 10/19 | vs Army100 rush yards | W 28-21 | 17 | 108 | 6.40 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 6.1 |
| Sat 10/12 | @ Coastal Carolina100 rush yards · 2+ TD | W 31-21 | 20 | 110 | 5.50 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 5.4 |
| Sat 10/5 | vs Arkansas State100 rush yards | W 52-38 | 14 | 139 | 9.90 | 1 | 2 | 10 | 9.3 |
| Sat 9/21 | @ Texas State | L 34-37 | 12 | 55 | 4.60 | 0 | — | — | 4.6 |
| Sat 9/14 | @ Western Michigan100 rush yards | L 10-57 | 19 | 127 | 6.70 | 0 | 2 | 10 | 6.5 |
| Sat 9/7 | vs Unknown | — | 9 | 52 | 5.80 | 1 | — | — | 5.8 |
| Sat 8/31 | @ Tennessee | W 38-30 | 21 | 95 | 4.50 | 1 | 1 | 12 | 4.9 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Georgia State
2016-2019
Opening stop
Season Progression
201620172017201820192019
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 Regular Season | Georgia State | 136 | 56.2 | 5.5 | — |
| 2017 Postseason | Georgia State | 61 | 34.9 | 8.7 | -75 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Georgia State | 61 | 34.9 | 8.7 | 0 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Georgia State | 621 | 43.3 | 19.3 | 560 |
| 2019 Postseason | Georgia State | 1,522 | 58.8 | 32.6 | 901 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Georgia State | 1,522 | 58.8 | 32.6 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Coastal Carolina
Loss with 161 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
161
Primary metric
161 scrimmage yards and 21.2 usage.
#2
Troy
244
Primary metric
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load.
244 scrimmage yards and 46.7 usage.
#3
Texas State
31
Primary metric
Win with 31 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
31 scrimmage yards and 4.7 usage.
#4
App State
49
Primary metric
Loss with 49 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
49 scrimmage yards and 16.7 usage.
#5
UL Monroe
190
Primary metric
Loss driven by a workhorse rushing load.
190 scrimmage yards and 48.5 usage.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2019 Postseason · Georgia State
1,522 primary output · 58.8 efficiency · 32.6 usage
65.3
#2
2019 Regular Season · Georgia State
65.3
1,522 primary · 58.8 efficiency · 32.6 usage
#3
2018 Regular Season · Georgia State
36.6
621 primary · 43.3 efficiency · 19.3 usage
Milestones
10
100+ rush yards
3
150+ scrimmage yards
5
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
2★
Class 2016 · Rating 0.7793
Elbert County · Elberton, GA
- Committed To
- Georgia State
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2016
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
2,340
Career Scrimmage Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 36 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.