Usage Score
13.2
Player Dossier
2016-2019Michigan State
WR • 6'2" • 219 lbs • Sicklerville, NJ, USA
Cam Chambers reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
13.2
Efficiency
85.3
Consistency
52.5
Season Value
62.7
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season · Michigan State
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Cam Chambers, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season · Michigan State. Cam Chambers reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Cam Chambers played WR for Michigan State. Across 4 tracked seasons, Cam Chambers recorded 330 receiving yards and 1 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2018 with Michigan State.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season
Michigan State paired 264 primary output with 85.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
2018 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 85.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2019 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Northwestern
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
7
Receiving Yards / G
37.7
Efficiency
85.3
Usage
13.2
Consistency
52.5
Best Game by takeover score
Rutgers
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Northwestern: 82. Penn State: 55. Michigan: 20. Purdue: 53. Maryland: 11. Ohio State: 30. Rutgers: 13
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Northwestern: 5 by 100. Penn State: 3 by 100. Michigan: 1 by 100. Purdue: 5 by 70.7. Maryland: 1 by 73.3. Ohio State: 3 by 66.7. Rutgers: 1 by 86.7
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
7 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Northwestern
Best efficiency game
100 vs Michigan
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Michigan State
2016-2019
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 Regular Season | Michigan State | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2017 Regular Season | Michigan State | 66 | 74.2 | 5.3 | 66 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Michigan State | 264 | 85.3 | 13.2 | 198 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Michigan State | 0 | — | — | -264 |
#1 Featured game
Northwestern
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
82
Primary metric
82 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Bowling Green
29
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
29 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Penn State
55
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
55 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Purdue
53
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
53 receiving yards with a 70.7 efficiency score.
#5
Michigan
20
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
20 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2018 Regular Season · Michigan State
264 primary output · 85.3 efficiency · 13.2 usage
62.7
#2
2017 Regular Season · Michigan State
41.7
66 primary · 74.2 efficiency · 5.3 usage
#3
2016 Regular Season · Michigan State
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2016 · Rating 0.9135
Timber Creek · Sicklerville, NJ
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
330
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 11 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.