Player Stats

Jeremy Smith College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
96
TFL
3.5
Passes defended
18
Touchdowns
2

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2016 PostseasonArkansas State41-0--018.6
2016 Regular SeasonArkansas State42-0-2018.6
2017 Regular SeasonArkansas State69-0-107.2
2018 PostseasonArkansas State121-0--018.2
2018 Regular SeasonArkansas State12250.50-5018.2
2019 PostseasonArkansas State134-0--060.2
2019 Regular SeasonArkansas State135430-10260.2

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason

Arkansas State paired 16 primary output with 30.9 efficiency.

Supporting note

2019 Postseason role shape

impact-led usage with 30.9 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2019 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: UNLV

Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2019 Postseason · Arkansas State

Games

13

Havoc Plays / G

1.2

Efficiency

30.9

Usage

6.3

Consistency

57.1

Best Game by takeover score

UNLV

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678910111213

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Florida International: 1. SMU: 0. UNLV: 3. Georgia: 0. Southern Illinois: 2. Troy: 2. Georgia State: 2. Louisiana: 2. Texas State: 0. UL Monroe: 0. Coastal Carolina: 2. Georgia Southern: 1. South Alabama: 1

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Florida International: 4 by 26.7. SMU: 3 by 12.5. UNLV: 1 by 34.2. Georgia: 4 by 16.7. Southern Illinois: 5 by 40.8. Troy: 6 by 45. Georgia State: 6 by 45. Louisiana: 1 by 24.2. Texas State: 4 by 16.7. UL Monroe: 8 by 33.3. Coastal Carolina: 4 by 36.7. Georgia Southern: 7 by 39.2. South Alabama: 5 by 30.8

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins1.4 · Games = 8 · +0.4 vs Losses
Losses1 · Games = 5 · -0.4 vs Wins