Player Stats

Justin McInnis College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Receiving yards
1,631
Receptions
120
Touchdowns
11

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesRecRec YdsTDOverall
2015 Regular SeasonArkansas State0-00-
2016 PostseasonArkansas State813036.7
2016 Regular SeasonArkansas State8980136.7
2017 PostseasonArkansas State127107173.1
2017 Regular SeasonArkansas State1242693373.1
2018 PostseasonArkansas State13554073
2018 Regular SeasonArkansas State1356694673

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason

Arkansas State paired 800 primary output with 83.9 efficiency.

Supporting note

2018 Postseason role shape

target-driven usage with 75.5 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2018 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: South Alabama

Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2018 Postseason · Arkansas State

Games

13

Receiving Yards / G

57.5

Efficiency

75.5

Usage

19.8

Consistency

56.9

Best Game by takeover score

South Alabama

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678910111213

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Nevada: 54. Southeast Missouri State: 48. Alabama: 20. Tulsa: 66. UNLV: 39. Georgia Southern: 60. App State: 55. Georgia State: 86. Louisiana: 26. South Alabama: 177. Coastal Carolina: 34. UL Monroe: 41. Texas State: 42

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Nevada: 5 by 72. Southeast Missouri State: 4 by 80. Alabama: 2 by 66.7. Tulsa: 6 by 73.3. UNLV: 3 by 86.7. Georgia Southern: 8 by 50. App State: 7 by 52.4. Georgia State: 6 by 95.6. Louisiana: 2 by 86.7. South Alabama: 7 by 100. Coastal Carolina: 4 by 56.7. UL Monroe: 3 by 91.1. Texas State: 4 by 70

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins66.6 · Games = 8 · +23.6 vs Losses
Losses43 · Games = 5 · -23.6 vs Wins