Usage Score
9.8
Player Dossier
2016-2019Michigan
TE • 6'5" • 246 lbs • Dudley, MA, USA
Sean McKeon reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
9.8
Efficiency
82.9
Consistency
71.3
Season Value
61.3
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2019 Regular Season · Michigan
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Sean McKeon, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2019 Regular Season · Michigan. Sean McKeon reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2019 Regular Season
Michigan paired 235 primary output with 82.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
2019 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 82.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2019 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Ohio State
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
7
Receiving Yards / G
33.6
Efficiency
82.9
Usage
9.8
Consistency
71.3
Best Game by takeover score
Ohio State
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Middle Tennessee: 37. Army: 35. Wisconsin: 24. Maryland: 29. Michigan State: 46. Indiana: -2. Ohio State: 66
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Middle Tennessee: 2 by 100. Army: 2 by 100. Wisconsin: 2 by 80. Maryland: 1 by 100. Michigan State: 2 by 100. Indiana: 1 by 0. Ohio State: 3 by 100
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
7 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Ohio State
Best efficiency game
100 vs Ohio State
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Michigan
2016-2019
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 Regular Season | Michigan | 10 | 33.3 | 11.8 | — |
| 2017 Postseason | Michigan | 301 | 53.4 | 18.8 | 291 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Michigan | 301 | 53.4 | 18.8 | 0 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Michigan | 122 | 55.1 | 11.3 | -179 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Michigan | 235 | 82.9 | 9.8 | 113 |
#1 Featured game
Purdue
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
82
Primary metric
82 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Ohio State
66
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
66 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Nebraska
29
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
29 receiving yards with a 96.7 efficiency score.
#4
Michigan State
59
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
59 receiving yards with a 98.3 efficiency score.
#5
Michigan State
46
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
46 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2019 Regular Season · Michigan
235 primary output · 82.9 efficiency · 9.8 usage
61.3
#2
2017 Postseason · Michigan
54.4
301 primary · 53.4 efficiency · 18.8 usage
#3
2017 Regular Season · Michigan
54.4
301 primary · 53.4 efficiency · 18.8 usage
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2023 · Rating 0.8539
Pine Forest · Pensacola, FL
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
668
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 27 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Sean McKeon quick answers
Recruiting profile
3-star recruit