Usage Score
12.5
Player Dossier
2016-2018Michigan
Devin Bush
LB • 5'11" • 233 lbs • Pembroke Pines, FL, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Devin Bush shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 38.3 disruption score.
Efficiency
38.3
Consistency
58.5
Season Value
32.4
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason · Michigan
1616171718
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- Michigan
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Indiana
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Devin Bush, LB. Best season Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason · Michigan. Devin Bush shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 38.3 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason
Michigan paired 0 primary output with 6.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
2018 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with 38.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2018 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Indiana
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2018 Regular Season · Michigan
Games
12
Havoc Plays / G
1.5
Efficiency
38.3
Usage
12.5
Consistency
58.5
Best Game by takeover score
Ohio State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Notre Dame: 3. Western Michigan: 0. SMU: 1. Nebraska: 3. Northwestern: 1. Maryland: 0. Wisconsin: 2. Michigan State: 2. Penn State: 0. Rutgers: 2. Indiana: 3. Ohio State: 1
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Notre Dame: 7 by 59.2. Western Michigan: 5 by 20.8. SMU: 7 by 39.2. Nebraska: 6 by 55. Northwestern: 1 by 14.2. Maryland: 6 by 25. Wisconsin: 4 by 36.7. Michigan State: 4 by 36.7. Penn State: 7 by 29.2. Rutgers: 3 by 32.5. Indiana: 11 by 75.8. Ohio State: 6 by 35
Split Comparison
Wins1.4 · n=10 · -0.6 vs Losses
Losses2 · n=2 · +0.6 vs Wins
First Half1.3 · n=6 · -0.3 vs Second Half
Second Half1.7 · n=6 · +0.3 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Indiana
Best efficiency game
75.8 vs Indiana
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/24 | @ Ohio State | L 39-62 | 6 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 11/17 | vs Indiana10+ tackles | W 31-20 | 11 | 8 | — | 1.50 | 0.50 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 11/10 | @ Rutgers | W 42-7 | 3 | 1 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 11/3 | vs Penn State | W 42-7 | 7 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/20 | @ Michigan State | W 21-7 | 4 | 2 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/13 | vs Wisconsin | W 38-13 | 4 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/6 | vs Maryland | W 42-21 | 6 | 5 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/29 | @ Northwestern | W 20-17 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 9/22 | vs NebraskaSplash game | W 56-10 | 6 | 6 | — | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/15 | vs SMU | W 45-20 | 7 | 5 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/8 | vs Western Michigan | W 49-3 | 5 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/1 | @ Notre Dame | L 17-24 | 7 | 3 | — | 1.50 | 1.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Michigan
2016-2018
Opening stop
Season Progression
20162016201720172018
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 Postseason | Michigan | 0 | 6.6 | 1.2 | — |
| 2016 Regular Season | Michigan | 0 | 6.6 | 1.2 | 0 |
| 2017 Postseason | Michigan | 23.5 | 47.1 | 10.6 | 23.5 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Michigan | 23.5 | 47.1 | 10.6 | 0 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Michigan | 18 | 38.3 | 12.5 | -5.5 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Indiana
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3
Primary metric
3 disruption/tackle impact with 66.1 takeover score.
#2
Purdue
6
Primary metric
Win with 6 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
6 disruption/tackle impact with 65.2 takeover score.
#3
Notre Dame
3
Primary metric
Loss with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 60.5 takeover score.
#4
Nebraska
3
Primary metric
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 56.2 takeover score.
#5
Florida
4
Primary metric
Win with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
4 disruption/tackle impact with 51.7 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2016 Postseason · Michigan
0 primary output · 6.6 efficiency · 1.2 usage
35.9
#2
2016 Regular Season · Michigan
35.9
0 primary · 6.6 efficiency · 1.2 usage
#3
2017 Postseason · Michigan
32.6
23.5 primary · 47.1 efficiency · 10.6 usage
Milestones
3
Impact games
3
Splash games
3
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2016 · Rating 0.8951
Flanagan · Hollywood, FL
- Committed To
- Michigan
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2016
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
171
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 32 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.