Player Stats

DJ Turner College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Receiving yards
928
Receptions
68
Touchdowns
6

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesRecRec YdsTDOverall
2016 Regular SeasonMaryland3219027
2017 Regular SeasonMaryland6532026.2
2018 Regular SeasonMaryland713159160.2
2019 Regular SeasonMaryland3484244.1
2020 Regular SeasonPittsburgh1144634362.4
2020 Regular SeasonMaryland11-0062.4

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2020 Regular Season

Pittsburgh paired 634 primary output with 60.6 efficiency.

Supporting note

2020 Regular Season role shape

target-driven usage with 60.6 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2020 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Multi-stop career journey

Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Maryland, Pittsburgh.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: NC State

Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2020 Regular Season · Pittsburgh

Games

11

Receiving Yards / G

57.6

Efficiency

60.6

Usage

16.5

Consistency

33.7

Best Game by takeover score

NC State

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

1234567891011

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Austin Peay: 76. Syracuse: 48. Louisville: 9. NC State: 186. Boston College: 12. Miami: 1. Notre Dame: 5. Florida State: -1. Virginia Tech: 184. Clemson: 32. Georgia Tech: 82

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Austin Peay: 2 by 100. Syracuse: 5 by 64. Louisville: 2 by 30. NC State: 8 by 100. Boston College: 1 by 80. Miami: 1 by 6.7. Notre Dame: 1 by 33.3. Florida State: 1 by 0. Virginia Tech: 15 by 81.8. Clemson: 3 by 71.1. Georgia Tech: 5 by 100

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins66.3 · Games = 6 · +19.1 vs Losses
Losses47.2 · Games = 5 · -19.1 vs Wins