Player Stats

Chase Pine College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
114
TFL
16
Sacks
2.5
QB hurries
7
Passes defended
4

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2017 Regular SeasonPittsburgh411-0--042.6
2018 PostseasonPittsburgh82-01-017.3
2018 Regular SeasonPittsburgh81020--017.3
2019 PostseasonPittsburgh91-0--041.5
2019 Regular SeasonPittsburgh91840.522041.5
2020 Regular SeasonPittsburgh104371.532059.1
2021 Regular SeasonPittsburgh122930.51-027.5

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2020 Regular Season

Pittsburgh paired 13.5 primary output with 31.4 efficiency.

Supporting note

2021 Regular Season role shape

impact-led usage with 13.8 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value cooled off

2021 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Virginia

Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2021 Regular Season · Pittsburgh

Games

12

Havoc Plays / G

0.4

Efficiency

13.8

Usage

2.9

Consistency

38.9

Best Game by takeover score

Virginia

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456789101112

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Massachusetts: 0. Tennessee: 0.5. Western Michigan: 0. Georgia Tech: 0.5. Virginia Tech: 0. Clemson: 0. Miami: 1. Duke: 1. North Carolina: 0. Virginia: 1. Syracuse: 0. Wake Forest: 0.5

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Massachusetts: 3 by 12.5. Tennessee: 1 by 9.2. Western Michigan: 6 by 25. Georgia Tech: 1 by 9.2. Virginia Tech: 1 by 4.2. Clemson: 1 by 4.2. Miami: 2 by 18.3. Duke: 4 by 26.7. North Carolina: 2 by 8.3. Virginia: 4 by 26.7. Syracuse: 1 by 4.2. Wake Forest: 3 by 17.5

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins0.3 · Games = 10 · -0.2 vs Losses
Losses0.5 · Games = 2 · +0.2 vs Wins