Player Stats

Therran Coleman College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
45
TFL
3.5
Passes defended
4

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2017 Regular SeasonPittsburgh26-0--042.6
2018 Regular SeasonPittsburgh47-0--012.7
2019 Regular SeasonPittsburgh44-0--037
2020 Regular SeasonWestern Michigan00-0--0-
2021 PostseasonWestern Michigan123-0--054.7
2021 Regular SeasonWestern Michigan12253.50-4054.7

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2021 Postseason

Western Michigan paired 7.5 primary output with 16 efficiency.

Supporting note

2021 Postseason role shape

impact-led usage with 16 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2021 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Multi-stop career journey

Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Pittsburgh, Western Michigan.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Michigan

Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2021 Postseason · Western Michigan

Games

12

Havoc Plays / G

0.6

Efficiency

16

Usage

4.7

Consistency

64.2

Best Game by takeover score

Michigan

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456789101112

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Nevada: 0. Michigan: 1. Illinois State: 1. Pittsburgh: 1. Buffalo: 1. Ball State: 1. Kent State: 1. Toledo: 0. Central Michigan: 0. Akron: 1. Eastern Michigan: 0. Northern Illinois: 0.5

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Nevada: 3 by 12.5. Michigan: 5 by 30.8. Illinois State: 2 by 18.3. Pittsburgh: 1 by 14.2. Buffalo: 3 by 22.5. Ball State: 2 by 18.3. Kent State: 0 by 10. Toledo: 1 by 4.2. Central Michigan: 3 by 12.5. Akron: 3 by 22.5. Eastern Michigan: 2 by 8.3. Northern Illinois: 3 by 17.5

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins0.8 · Games = 7 · +0.4 vs Losses
Losses0.4 · Games = 5 · -0.4 vs Wins