Player Stats

Isaiahh Loudermilk College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
61
TFL
11
Sacks
7.5
QB hurries
6
Passes defended
7

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2017 PostseasonWisconsin61-0-1027.5
2017 Regular SeasonWisconsin691.51.5--027.5
2018 Regular SeasonWisconsin5142112045.5
2019 PostseasonWisconsin123-0--053.4
2019 Regular SeasonWisconsin12215324053.4
2020 Regular SeasonWisconsin6132.523-052.8

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason

Wisconsin paired 14 primary output with 20 efficiency.

Supporting note

2020 Regular Season role shape

impact-led usage with 21.5 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2020 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Iowa

Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2020 Regular Season · Wisconsin

Games

6

Havoc Plays / G

1.3

Efficiency

21.5

Usage

8.3

Consistency

67.5

Best Game by takeover score

Iowa

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Illinois: 2. Michigan: 0. Northwestern: 2. Indiana: 1. Iowa: 2. Minnesota: 0.5

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Illinois: 2 by 28.3. Michigan: 2 by 8.3. Northwestern: 2 by 28.3. Indiana: 1 by 14.2. Iowa: 4 by 36.7. Minnesota: 2 by 13.3

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins0.8 · Games = 3 · -0.8 vs Losses
Losses1.7 · Games = 3 · +0.8 vs Wins