Player Stats

Jack Dunn College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Receiving yards
340
Receptions
38
Touchdowns
3

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesRecRec YdsTDOverall
2017 Regular SeasonWisconsin0-00-
2018 PostseasonWisconsin12-0032.6
2018 Regular SeasonWisconsin12120032.6
2019 PostseasonWisconsin8-0025.1
2019 Regular SeasonWisconsin8541225.1
2020 PostseasonWisconsin6660079
2020 Regular SeasonWisconsin622195179
2021 PostseasonWisconsin7-0022.3
2021 Regular SeasonWisconsin7424022.3

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2020 Postseason

Wisconsin paired 255 primary output with 55.7 efficiency.

Supporting note

2021 Postseason role shape

target-driven usage with 34.5 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2021 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Northwestern

Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2021 Postseason · Wisconsin

Games

7

Receiving Yards / G

3.4

Efficiency

34.5

Usage

9.3

Consistency

14.3

Best Game by takeover score

Northwestern

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

1234567

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Arizona State: 0. Penn State: 0. Eastern Michigan: 0. Illinois: 0. Iowa: 3. Northwestern: 17. Nebraska: 4

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Iowa: 1 by 20. Northwestern: 2 by 56.7. Nebraska: 1 by 26.7

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins4 · Games = 6 · +4 vs Losses
Losses0 · Games = 1 · -4 vs Wins