Player Stats

Garrett Groshek College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Scrimmage yards
1,827
Rushing yards
1,216
Receiving yards
611
Touchdowns
8

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesScrimmageRush YdsRec YdsTDOverall
2017 PostseasonWisconsin13330051.1
2017 Regular SeasonWisconsin1333429440251.1
2018 PostseasonWisconsin13251510066.4
2018 Regular SeasonWisconsin13563410153266.4
2019 PostseasonWisconsin1426719051.1
2019 Regular SeasonWisconsin14457187270251.1
2020 PostseasonWisconsin6554114157.2
2020 Regular SeasonWisconsin6364259105157.2

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason

Wisconsin paired 588 primary output with 63.3 efficiency.

Supporting note

2020 Postseason role shape

backfield-heavy usage with 41.3 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2020 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Minnesota

Win driven by a workhorse rushing load. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2020 Postseason · Wisconsin

Games

6

Scrimmage Yards / G

69.8

Efficiency

41.3

Usage

25.7

Consistency

42.8

Best Game by takeover score

Minnesota

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Wake Forest: 55. Illinois: 99. Northwestern: 28. Indiana: 33. Iowa: 37. Minnesota: 167

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Wake Forest: 16 by 34. Illinois: 17 by 57.9. Northwestern: 11 by 19.5. Indiana: 6 by 47.9. Iowa: 11 by 23.4. Minnesota: 28 by 65

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins107 · Games = 3 · +74.3 vs Losses
Losses32.7 · Games = 3 · -74.3 vs Wins