Usage Score
12.1
Player Dossier
2016-2016Bowling Green
WR • 5'10" • Lakeland, FL, USA
Marquis Zimmerman reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
12.1
Efficiency
49.8
Consistency
26
Season Value
45.6
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season · Bowling Green
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Marquis Zimmerman, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season · Bowling Green. Marquis Zimmerman reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season
Bowling Green paired 184 primary output with 49.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 49.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Memphis
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
10
Receiving Yards / G
18.4
Efficiency
49.8
Usage
12.1
Consistency
26
Best Game by takeover score
Buffalo
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Ohio State: 43. Unknown: 8. Memphis: 75. Eastern Michigan: 1. Ohio: 5. Toledo: 22. Miami (OH): 6. Northern Illinois: 24. Kent State: 0. Buffalo: 0
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Ohio State: 7 by 41. Unknown: 1 by 53.3. Memphis: 4 by 100. Eastern Michigan: 3 by 2.2. Ohio: 1 by 33.3. Toledo: 3 by 48.9. Miami (OH): 1 by 40. Northern Illinois: 2 by 80
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
10 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Memphis
Best efficiency game
100 vs Memphis
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 11/25 | vs Buffalo | W 27-19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Wed 11/16 | vs Kent State | W 42-7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Wed 11/2 | @ Northern Illinois | L 20-45 | — | 2 | 24 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 10/22 | vs Miami (OH) | L 26-40 | — | 1 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 6 |
| Sat 10/15 | @ Toledo | L 35-42 | — | 3 | 22 | 7.3 | 7.30 | 1 | 20 |
| Sat 10/8 | @ Ohio | L 24-30 | — | 1 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 5 |
| Sat 10/1 | vs Eastern Michigan | L 25-28 | — | 3 | 1 | 2.3 | 0.30 | 0 | 2 |
| Sun 9/25 | @ Memphis | L 3-77 | — | 4 | 75 | 18.8 | 18.80 | 0 | 40 |
| Sat 9/10 | vs Unknown | — | — | 1 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 8 |
| Sat 9/3 | @ Ohio State | L 10-77 | — | 7 | 43 | 6.1 | 6.10 | 0 | 12 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Bowling Green
2016
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 Regular Season | Bowling Green | 184 | 49.8 | 12.1 | — |
#1 Featured game
Memphis
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
75
Primary metric
75 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Ohio State
43
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
43 receiving yards with a 41 efficiency score.
#3
Northern Illinois
24
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
24 receiving yards with a 80 efficiency score.
#4
Toledo
22
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
22 receiving yards with a 48.9 efficiency score.
#5
Unknown
8
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
8 receiving yards with a 53.3 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2016 Regular Season · Bowling Green
184 primary output · 49.8 efficiency · 12.1 usage
45.6
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2023 · Rating 0.827
Sterlington · Monroe, LA
Career Facts
1
Career teams
1
Seasons tracked
184
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 1 tracked seasons, 10 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Marquis Zimmerman quick answers
Recruiting profile
3-star recruit