Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2021 Regular Season
New Mexico State paired 629 primary output with 76.1 efficiency.
Player Stats
Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.
Stat Footprint
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Rec | Rec Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 Regular Season | Bowling Green | 0 | - | 0 | 0 | - |
| 2016 Regular Season | Bowling Green | 0 | - | 0 | 0 | - |
| 2017 Regular Season | Bowling Green | 1 | 4 | 45 | 0 | 57.9 |
| 2019 Regular Season | New Mexico State | 6 | 7 | 139 | 1 | 46 |
| 2020 Regular Season | New Mexico State | 0 | - | 0 | 0 | 0.1 |
| 2021 Regular Season | New Mexico State | 12 | 49 | 629 | 3 | 72.4 |
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2021 Regular Season
New Mexico State paired 629 primary output with 76.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
2021 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 76.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2021 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Bowling Green, New Mexico State.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Massachusetts
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
52.4
Efficiency
76.1
Usage
15.6
Consistency
61.4
Best Game by takeover score
Massachusetts
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. San Diego State: 74. UTEP: 7. New Mexico: 23. South Carolina State: 38. Hawai'i: 114. San José State: 52. Nevada: 64. Hawai'i: 49. Utah State: 59. Alabama: 6. Kentucky: 17. Massachusetts: 126
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. San Diego State: 5 by 98.7. UTEP: 1 by 46.7. New Mexico: 3 by 51.1. South Carolina State: 2 by 100. Hawai'i: 9 by 84.4. San José State: 6 by 57.8. Nevada: 6 by 71.1. Hawai'i: 5 by 65.3. Utah State: 4 by 98.3. Alabama: 1 by 40. Kentucky: 1 by 100. Massachusetts: 6 by 100
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.