Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2019 Regular Season
Purdue paired 10 primary output with 24.6 efficiency.
Player Stats
Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.
Stat Footprint
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Tackles | TFL | Sacks | QB Hur | PD | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 Regular Season | Purdue | 1 | 1 | - | 0 | - | - | 0 | 37.2 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Purdue | 11 | 38 | 3.5 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 58.4 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Purdue | 10 | 35 | 7 | 2 | 1 | - | 0 | 60.1 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Purdue | 3 | 6 | - | 0 | - | - | 0 | 40 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Purdue | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | - | - | 0 | - |
| 2022 Regular Season | Marshall | 11 | 34 | 4 | 1 | 1 | - | 0 | 39.1 |
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2019 Regular Season
Purdue paired 10 primary output with 24.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
2022 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with 18.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2022 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Purdue, Marshall.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: James Madison
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
11
Havoc Plays / G
0.5
Efficiency
18.3
Usage
3.5
Consistency
48.7
Best Game by takeover score
James Madison
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Norfolk State: 0.5. Notre Dame: 0. Bowling Green: 0. Troy: 0. Gardner-Webb: 1. Louisiana: 0.5. James Madison: 2. Coastal Carolina: 1.5. App State: 0. Georgia Southern: 0. Georgia State: 0.5
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Norfolk State: 3 by 17.5. Notre Dame: 1 by 4.2. Bowling Green: 3 by 12.5. Troy: 1 by 4.2. Gardner-Webb: 2 by 18.3. Louisiana: 4 by 21.7. James Madison: 3 by 32.5. Coastal Carolina: 2 by 23.3. App State: 5 by 20.8. Georgia Southern: 3 by 12.5. Georgia State: 7 by 34.2
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.