Player Dossier

2017-2021

UL Monroe

Jared Sparks

WR • 6'1" • 215 lbs • Geismar, LA, USA

Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher

Jared Sparks reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.

Usage Score

17.5

Efficiency

69.8

Consistency

71

Season Value

64.4

Career Arc

Value trend by season

Best season by value score: 2021 Regular Season · UL Monroe

171718192021

Snapshot

Career Teams
2
Seasons Tracked
6
Program Path
Purdue • UL Monroe
Peak Game
Peak game by takeover score: Troy

Scouting Read

Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.

Jared Sparks, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2021 Regular Season · UL Monroe. Jared Sparks reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.

Jared Sparks played WR for Purdue and UL Monroe. Across 5 tracked seasons, Jared Sparks recorded 7 passing yards, 135 rushing yards, and 978 receiving yards. His top tracked season came in 2017 with Purdue.

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2021 Regular Season

UL Monroe paired 336 primary output with 69.8 efficiency.

Supporting note

2021 Regular Season role shape

target-driven usage with 69.8 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value is trending up

2021 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Multi-stop career journey

Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Purdue, UL Monroe.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Troy

Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2021 Regular Season · UL Monroe

Games

11

Receiving Yards / G

30.5

Efficiency

69.8

Usage

17.5

Consistency

71

Best Game by takeover score

Louisiana

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

1234567891011

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Kentucky: -3. Unknown: 27. Troy: 63. Coastal Carolina: 17. Georgia State: 29. Liberty: 29. South Alabama: 45. App State: 29. Texas State: 42. LSU: 16. Louisiana: 42

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Kentucky: 2 by 0. Unknown: 3 by 60. Troy: 3 by 100. Coastal Carolina: 3 by 37.8. Georgia State: 3 by 64.4. Liberty: 3 by 64.4. South Alabama: 4 by 75. App State: 2 by 96.7. Texas State: 2 by 100. LSU: 1 by 100. Louisiana: 4 by 70

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins45.7 · Games = 3 · +21.1 vs Losses
Losses24.6 · Games = 7 · -21.1 vs Wins
First Half27 · Games = 6 · -7.8 vs Second Half
Second Half34.8 · Games = 5 · +7.8 vs First Half

Game Log

Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.

11 games

Featured metric

Receiving Yards

Top game by takeover score

Troy

Best efficiency game

100 vs LSU

Result
Sat 11/27@ LouisianaL 16-2144210.510.50024
Sun 11/21@ LSUL 14-271161616016
Sat 11/6@ Texas StateL 19-272422121043
Sat 10/30@ App StateL 28-5922914.514.50024
Sat 10/23vs South AlabamaW 41-3144511.311.30120
Sat 10/16vs LibertyW 31-283299.79.70021
Sun 10/10vs Georgia StateL 21-553299.79.70017
Sat 10/2@ Coastal CarolinaL 6-593175.75.7007
Sun 9/26vs TroyW 29-163632121037
Sun 9/19vs Unknown32799021
Sat 9/4@ KentuckyL 10-452-3-1.5-1.5001

Career Arc

Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.

  1. 1

    Purdue

    2017-2020

    Opening stop

  2. 2

    UL Monroe

    2021

    Final stop

Season Progression

201720172018201920202021
SeasonTeamPrimaryEfficiencyUsageDelta
2017 PostseasonPurdue22267.610.4
2017 Regular SeasonPurdue22267.610.40
2018 Regular SeasonPurdue27463.41052
2019 Regular SeasonPurdue10865.28.2-166
2020 Regular SeasonPurdue38606.7-70
2021 Regular SeasonUL Monroe33669.817.5298

Signature Performances

Top Games

#1 Featured game

Troy

Win with an explosive receiving profile.

63

Primary metric

63 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.

#2

Northwestern

130

Primary metric

Loss with an explosive receiving profile.

130 receiving yards with a 78.8 efficiency score.

#3

Illinois

32

Primary metric

Win with an explosive receiving profile.

32 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.

#4

Vanderbilt

65

Primary metric

Win with an explosive receiving profile.

65 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.

#5

Northwestern

76

Primary metric

Loss with an explosive receiving profile.

76 receiving yards with a 84.4 efficiency score.

Top Seasons

#1 Season by value score

2021 Regular Season · UL Monroe

336 primary output · 69.8 efficiency · 17.5 usage

64.4

#2

2018 Regular Season · Purdue

47.9

274 primary · 63.4 efficiency · 10 usage

#3

2017 Postseason · Purdue

40.7

222 primary · 67.6 efficiency · 10.4 usage

Milestones

1

100+ receiving yards

1

8+ catch outings

0

2+ TD games

Bio, Recruit, and Data Context

Recruit Profile

2★

Class 2016 · Rating 0.7652

Dutchtown · Geismar, LA

Committed To
Purdue
Commit Date
Jan 1, 2016

Career Facts

2

Career teams

6

Seasons tracked

978

Career Receiving Yards

Data Context

Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 38 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.