Usage Score
27.5
Player Dossier
2016-2019USC
Michael Pittman Jr.
WR • 6'4" • 220 lbs • Woodland Hills, CA, USA
Alpha targetExplosive finisher
Michael Pittman Jr. reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
73.8
Consistency
58.5
Season Value
64.9
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason · USC
16161717181919
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 7
- Program Path
- USC
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Utah
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Michael Pittman Jr., WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason · USC. Michael Pittman Jr. reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason
USC paired 1,275 primary output with 73.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
2019 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 73.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2019 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Utah
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2019 Postseason · USC
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
98.1
Efficiency
73.8
Usage
27.5
Consistency
58.5
Best Game by takeover score
Iowa
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Iowa: 53. Fresno State: 28. Stanford: 82. BYU: 95. Utah: 232. Washington: 64. Notre Dame: 29. Arizona: 69. Colorado: 156. Oregon: 37. Arizona State: 146. California: 180. UCLA: 104
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Iowa: 6 by 58.9. Fresno State: 6 by 31.1. Stanford: 6 by 91.1. BYU: 9 by 70.4. Utah: 10 by 100. Washington: 4 by 100. Notre Dame: 4 by 48.3. Arizona: 4 by 100. Colorado: 7 by 100. Oregon: 8 by 30.8. Arizona State: 13 by 74.9. California: 11 by 100. UCLA: 13 by 53.3
Split Comparison
Wins124.6 · n=8 · +69.0 vs Losses
Losses55.6 · n=5 · -69.0 vs Wins
First Half83.3 · n=7 · -32.0 vs Second Half
Second Half115.3 · n=6 · +32.0 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Utah
Best efficiency game
100 vs California
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/28 | @ Iowa | L 24-49 | — | 6 | 53 | 8.8 | 8.80 | 0 | 22 |
| Sat 11/23 | vs UCLA100 receiving yards · High volume | W 52-35 | — | 13 | 104 | 8 | 8 | 2 | 13 |
| Sun 11/17 | @ California100 receiving yards · High volume | W 41-17 | — | 11 | 180 | 16.4 | 16.40 | 1 | 45 |
| Sat 11/9 | @ Arizona State100 receiving yards · High volume | W 31-26 | — | 13 | 146 | 11.2 | 11.20 | 0 | 28 |
| Sun 11/3 | vs OregonHigh volume | L 24-56 | — | 8 | 37 | 4.6 | 4.60 | 1 | 13 |
| Sat 10/26 | @ Colorado100 receiving yards · 2+ TD | W 35-31 | — | 7 | 156 | 22.3 | 22.30 | 2 | 44 |
| Sun 10/20 | vs Arizona | W 41-14 | — | 4 | 69 | 17.3 | 17.30 | 1 | 54 |
| Sat 10/12 | @ Notre Dame | L 27-30 | — | 4 | 29 | 7.3 | 7.30 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 9/28 | @ Washington | L 14-28 | — | 4 | 64 | 16 | 16 | 1 | 44 |
| Sat 9/21 | vs Utah100 receiving yards · High volume | W 30-23 | — | 10 | 232 | 23.2 | 23.20 | 1 | 77 |
| Sat 9/14 | @ BYUHigh volume · 2+ TD | L 27-30 | — | 9 | 95 | 10.6 | 10.60 | 2 | 30 |
| Sun 9/8 | vs Stanford | W 45-20 | — | 6 | 82 | 13.7 | 13.70 | 0 | 31 |
| Sun 9/1 | vs Fresno State | W 31-23 | — | 6 | 28 | 4.7 | 4.70 | 0 | 9 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
USC
2016-2019
Opening stop
Season Progression
2016201620172017201820192019
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 Postseason | USC | 82 | 85 | 11.3 | — |
| 2016 Regular Season | USC | 82 | 85 | 11.3 | 0 |
| 2017 Postseason | USC | 404 | 87.7 | 14.4 | 322 |
| 2017 Regular Season | USC | 404 | 87.7 | 14.4 | 0 |
| 2018 Regular Season | USC | 743 | 90.9 | 20.3 | 339 |
| 2019 Postseason | USC | 1,275 | 73.8 | 27.5 | 532 |
| 2019 Regular Season | USC | 1,275 | 73.8 | 27.5 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Utah
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
232
Primary metric
232 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Stanford
146
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
146 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Colorado
144
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
144 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
California
180
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
180 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Oregon
61
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
61 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2019 Postseason · USC
1,275 primary output · 73.8 efficiency · 27.5 usage
64.9
#2
2019 Regular Season · USC
64.9
1,275 primary · 73.8 efficiency · 27.5 usage
#3
2018 Regular Season · USC
60.9
743 primary · 90.9 efficiency · 20.3 usage
Milestones
9
100+ receiving yards
6
8+ catch outings
5
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2016 · Rating 0.9688
Oaks Christian · Thousand Oaks, CA
- Committed To
- USC
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2016
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
2,504
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 41 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.