Player Dossier

2016-2020

Notre Dame

Bennett Skowronek

WR • 6'3" • 224 lbs • Fort Wayne, IN, USA

Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher

Bennett Skowronek reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.

Usage Score

15.9

Efficiency

79.9

Consistency

61.2

Season Value

56.7

Career Arc

Value trend by season

Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason · Northwestern

1617171818192020

Snapshot

Career Teams
2
Seasons Tracked
8
Program Path
Northwestern • Notre Dame
Peak Game
Peak game by takeover score: Nevada

Scouting Read

Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.

Bennett Skowronek, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason · Northwestern. Bennett Skowronek reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.

Bennett Skowronek played WR for Northwestern and Notre Dame. Across 5 tracked seasons, Bennett Skowronek recorded 17 rushing yards, 1,856 receiving yards, and 8 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2017 with Northwestern.

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason

Northwestern paired 644 primary output with 78 efficiency.

Supporting note

2020 Postseason role shape

target-driven usage with 79.9 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2020 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Multi-stop career journey

Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Northwestern, Notre Dame.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Pittsburgh

Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2020 Postseason · Notre Dame

Games

9

Receiving Yards / G

48.8

Efficiency

79.9

Usage

15.9

Consistency

61.2

Best Game by takeover score

Alabama

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456789

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Alabama: 41. Louisville: 28. Pittsburgh: 107. Georgia Tech: 8. Clemson: 33. Boston College: 63. North Carolina: 34. Syracuse: 71. Clemson: 54

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Alabama: 4 by 68.3. Louisville: 2 by 93.3. Pittsburgh: 2 by 100. Georgia Tech: 1 by 53.3. Clemson: 4 by 55. Boston College: 5 by 84. North Carolina: 3 by 75.6. Syracuse: 4 by 100. Clemson: 4 by 90

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins49.1 · Games = 7 · +1.6 vs Losses
Losses47.5 · Games = 2 · -1.6 vs Wins
First Half43.4 · Games = 5 · -12.1 vs Second Half
Second Half55.5 · Games = 4 · +12.1 vs First Half

Game Log

Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.

9 games

Featured metric

Receiving Yards

Top game by takeover score

Pittsburgh

Best efficiency game

100 vs Syracuse

Result
Fri 1/1@ AlabamaL 14-31441910.30020
Sat 12/19vs ClemsonL 10-3445413.513.50026
Sat 12/5vs SyracuseW 45-2147117.817.80029
Fri 11/27@ North CarolinaW 31-1733411.811.30021
Sat 11/14@ Boston College2+ TDW 45-3156312.612.60327
Sun 11/8vs ClemsonW 47-404338.38.30013
Sat 10/31@ Georgia TechW 31-13188808
Sat 10/24@ Pittsburgh100 receiving yards · 2+ TDW 45-3210753.553.50273
Sat 10/17vs LouisvilleW 12-72281414016

Career Arc

Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.

  1. 1

    Northwestern

    2016-2019

    Opening stop

  2. 2

    Notre Dame

    2020

    Final stop

Season Progression

20162017201720182018201920202020
SeasonTeamPrimaryEfficiencyUsageDelta
2016 Regular SeasonNorthwestern7056.16.3
2017 PostseasonNorthwestern6447817574
2017 Regular SeasonNorthwestern64478170
2018 PostseasonNorthwestern56272.813.7-82
2018 Regular SeasonNorthwestern56272.813.70
2019 Regular SeasonNorthwestern14178.230.3-421
2020 PostseasonNotre Dame43979.915.9298
2020 Regular SeasonNotre Dame43979.915.90

Signature Performances

Top Games

#1 Featured game

Nevada

Win with an explosive receiving profile.

123

Primary metric

123 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.

#2

UNLV

57

Primary metric

Win with an explosive receiving profile.

57 receiving yards with a 95 efficiency score.

#3

Purdue

117

Primary metric

Win with an explosive receiving profile.

117 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.

#4

Pittsburgh

107

Primary metric

Win with an explosive receiving profile.

107 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.

#5

Wisconsin

73

Primary metric

Win with an explosive receiving profile.

73 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.

Top Seasons

#1 Season by value score

2017 Postseason · Northwestern

644 primary output · 78 efficiency · 17 usage

61.4

#2

2017 Regular Season · Northwestern

61.4

644 primary · 78 efficiency · 17 usage

#3

2018 Postseason · Northwestern

60.6

562 primary · 72.8 efficiency · 13.7 usage

Milestones

3

100+ receiving yards

1

8+ catch outings

3

2+ TD games

Bio, Recruit, and Data Context

Recruit Profile

3★

Class 2016 · Rating 0.8556

Homestead · Fort Wayne, IN

Committed To
Northwestern
Commit Date
Jan 1, 2016

Career Facts

2

Career teams

8

Seasons tracked

1,856

Career Receiving Yards

Data Context

Coverage spans 8 tracked seasons, 45 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.