Player Stats

Landen Akers College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Receiving yards
593
Receptions
38
Touchdowns
1

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesRecRec YdsTDOverall
2017 PostseasonIowa State5-0034.5
2017 Regular SeasonIowa State5134034.5
2018 PostseasonIowa State915049.5
2018 Regular SeasonIowa State99176049.5
2019 PostseasonIowa State12-0035
2019 Regular SeasonIowa State129109035
2020 PostseasonIowa State10116063.2
2020 Regular SeasonIowa State1017253163.2

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2020 Postseason

Iowa State paired 269 primary output with 77.2 efficiency.

Supporting note

2020 Postseason role shape

target-driven usage with 77.2 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2020 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Kansas

Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2020 Postseason · Iowa State

Games

10

Receiving Yards / G

26.9

Efficiency

77.2

Usage

8.9

Consistency

46

Best Game by takeover score

Kansas

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678910

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Oregon: 16. Louisiana: 0. TCU: 60. Oklahoma: 35. Texas Tech: 34. Kansas: 76. Baylor: 11. Texas: 10. West Virginia: 2. Oklahoma: 25

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Oregon: 1 by 100. TCU: 2 by 100. Oklahoma: 1 by 100. Texas Tech: 4 by 56.7. Kansas: 6 by 84.4. Baylor: 1 by 73.3. Texas: 1 by 66.7. West Virginia: 1 by 13.3. Oklahoma: 1 by 100

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins30.5 · Games = 8 · +18 vs Losses
Losses12.5 · Games = 2 · -18 vs Wins