Usage Score
25.2
Player Dossier
2016-2020Auburn
Eli Stove
WR • 6'0" • 191 lbs • Niceville, FL, USA
Alpha targetPossession profile
Eli Stove reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
57.6
Consistency
59.2
Season Value
51.6
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2020 Postseason · Auburn
161617171819192020
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 9
- Program Path
- Auburn
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Alabama
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Eli Stove, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2020 Postseason · Auburn. Eli Stove reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Eli Stove played WR for Auburn. Across 5 tracked seasons, Eli Stove recorded 554 rushing yards, 1,186 receiving yards, and 4 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2017 with Auburn.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2020 Postseason
Auburn paired 359 primary output with 57.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
2020 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 57.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2020 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: LSU
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2020 Postseason · Auburn
Games
9
Receiving Yards / G
39.9
Efficiency
57.6
Usage
25.2
Consistency
59.2
Best Game by takeover score
Northwestern
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Northwestern: 29. Kentucky: 55. South Carolina: 60. Ole Miss: 22. LSU: 64. Tennessee: 48. Alabama: 29. Texas A&M: 29. Mississippi State: 23
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Northwestern: 4 by 48.3. Kentucky: 4 by 91.7. South Carolina: 7 by 57.1. Ole Miss: 5 by 29.3. LSU: 5 by 85.3. Tennessee: 3 by 100. Alabama: 7 by 27.6. Texas A&M: 4 by 48.3. Mississippi State: 5 by 30.7
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins42.4 · Games = 5 · +5.6 vs Losses
Losses36.8 · Games = 4 · -5.6 vs Wins
First Half46 · Games = 5 · +13.8 vs Second Half
Second Half32.3 · Games = 4 · -13.8 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
9 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
LSU
Best efficiency game
100 vs Tennessee
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 1/1 | @ Northwestern | L 19-35 | — | 4 | 29 | 7.3 | 7.30 | 0 | 12 |
| Sun 12/13 | @ Mississippi State | W 24-10 | — | 5 | 23 | 4.6 | 4.60 | 0 | 8 |
| Sat 12/5 | vs Texas A&M | L 20-31 | — | 4 | 29 | 7.3 | 7.30 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 11/28 | @ Alabama | L 13-42 | — | 7 | 29 | 5 | 4.10 | 0 | 10 |
| Sun 11/22 | vs Tennessee | W 30-17 | — | 3 | 48 | 12 | 16 | 0 | 21 |
| Sat 10/31 | vs LSU | W 48-11 | — | 5 | 64 | 10.6 | 12.80 | 1 | 38 |
| Sat 10/24 | @ Ole Miss | W 35-28 | — | 5 | 22 | 4.4 | 4.40 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 10/17 | @ South Carolina | L 22-30 | — | 7 | 60 | 9 | 8.60 | 1 | 16 |
| Sat 9/26 | vs Kentucky | W 29-13 | — | 4 | 55 | 12.4 | 13.80 | 1 | 21 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Auburn
2016-2020
Opening stop
Season Progression
201620162017201720182019201920202020
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 Postseason | Auburn | 224 | 56.2 | 26.5 | — |
| 2016 Regular Season | Auburn | 224 | 56.2 | 26.5 | 0 |
| 2017 Postseason | Auburn | 265 | 45.4 | 13.2 | 41 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Auburn | 265 | 45.4 | 13.2 | 0 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Auburn | 17 | 36.7 | 9.4 | -248 |
| 2019 Postseason | Auburn | 321 | 59.9 | 18.3 | 304 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Auburn | 321 | 59.9 | 18.3 | 0 |
| 2020 Postseason | Auburn | 359 | 57.6 | 25.2 | 38 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Auburn | 359 | 57.6 | 25.2 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Alabama
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
87
Primary metric
87 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Kent State
88
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
88 receiving yards with a 97.8 efficiency score.
#3
Mississippi State
75
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
75 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
LSU
64
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
64 receiving yards with a 85.3 efficiency score.
#5
Kentucky
55
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
55 receiving yards with a 91.7 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2020 Postseason · Auburn
359 primary output · 57.6 efficiency · 25.2 usage
51.6
#2
2020 Regular Season · Auburn
51.6
359 primary · 57.6 efficiency · 25.2 usage
#3
2019 Postseason · Auburn
45.2
321 primary · 59.9 efficiency · 18.3 usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2016 · Rating 0.9431
Niceville · Niceville, FL
- Committed To
- Auburn
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2016
Career Facts
1
Career teams
9
Seasons tracked
1,186
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 9 tracked seasons, 46 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.