Usage Score
11.7
Player Dossier
2016-2019Auburn
Derrick Brown
DT • 6'5" • 318 lbs • Sugar Hill, GA, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Derrick Brown shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 34.5 disruption score.
Efficiency
34.5
Consistency
33.4
Season Value
30
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason · Auburn
1616171718181919
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 8
- Program Path
- Auburn
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Texas A&M
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Derrick Brown, DT. Best season Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason · Auburn. Derrick Brown shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 34.5 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason
Auburn paired 20.5 primary output with 34.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
2019 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 34.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2019 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Texas A&M
Win with backfield disruption leading the way. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2019 Postseason · Auburn
Games
12
Havoc Plays / G
1.7
Efficiency
34.5
Usage
11.7
Consistency
33.4
Best Game by takeover score
Minnesota
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Minnesota: 0. Oregon: 0. Tulane: 1. Kent State: 1. Texas A&M: 7. Mississippi State: 0. Florida: 2. Arkansas: 0. LSU: 3. Ole Miss: 1. Georgia: 2. Alabama: 3.5
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Minnesota: 5 by 20.8. Oregon: 3 by 12.5. Tulane: 4 by 26.7. Kent State: 0 by 10. Texas A&M: 4 by 66.7. Mississippi State: 2 by 8.3. Florida: 5 by 40.8. Arkansas: 5 by 20.8. LSU: 7 by 59.2. Ole Miss: 7 by 39.2. Georgia: 6 by 45. Alabama: 7 by 64.2
Split Comparison
Wins1.7 · n=8 · -0.1 vs Losses
Losses1.8 · n=4 · +0.1 vs Wins
First Half1.5 · n=6 · -0.4 vs Second Half
Second Half1.9 · n=6 · +0.4 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Texas A&M
Best efficiency game
66.7 vs Texas A&M
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wed 1/1 | vs Minnesota | L 24-31 | 5 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/30 | vs AlabamaSplash game | W 48-45 | 7 | 5 | — | 3.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/16 | vs Georgia | L 14-21 | 6 | 3 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 11/2 | vs Ole Miss | W 20-14 | 7 | 5 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/26 | @ LSUSplash game | L 20-23 | 7 | 2 | — | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/19 | @ Arkansas | W 51-10 | 5 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/5 | @ Florida | L 13-24 | 5 | 3 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/28 | vs Mississippi State | W 56-23 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/21 | @ Texas A&M2+ sacks · Splash game | W 28-20 | 4 | 3 | — | 3 | 2 | — | 2 | — | — |
| Sat 9/14 | vs Kent State | W 55-16 | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 9/7 | vs Tulane | W 24-6 | 4 | 3 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 8/31 | vs Oregon | W 27-21 | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Auburn
2016-2019
Opening stop
Season Progression
20162016201720172018201820192019
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 Postseason | Auburn | 3.5 | 10.1 | 2.8 | — |
| 2016 Regular Season | Auburn | 3.5 | 10.1 | 2.8 | 0 |
| 2017 Postseason | Auburn | 11.5 | 27.6 | 8.8 | 8 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Auburn | 11.5 | 27.6 | 8.8 | 0 |
| 2018 Postseason | Auburn | 16.5 | 28.1 | 7.6 | 5 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Auburn | 16.5 | 28.1 | 7.6 | 0 |
| 2019 Postseason | Auburn | 20.5 | 34.5 | 11.7 | 4 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Auburn | 20.5 | 34.5 | 11.7 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Texas A&M
Win with backfield disruption leading the way.
7
Primary metric
7 disruption/tackle impact with 65 takeover score.
#2
Texas A&M
4.5
Primary metric
Win with 4.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
4.5 disruption/tackle impact with 58.3 takeover score.
#3
Clemson
3
Primary metric
Loss with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 52.4 takeover score.
#4
Unknown
3
Primary metric
Game with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 52 takeover score.
#5
Alabama
3.5
Primary metric
Win with 3.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3.5 disruption/tackle impact with 46 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2019 Postseason · Auburn
20.5 primary output · 34.5 efficiency · 11.7 usage
30
#2
2019 Regular Season · Auburn
30
20.5 primary · 34.5 efficiency · 11.7 usage
#3
2018 Postseason · Auburn
26.8
16.5 primary · 28.1 efficiency · 7.6 usage
Milestones
1
Impact games
7
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
5★
Class 2016 · Rating 0.9964
Lanier · Buford, GA
- Committed To
- Auburn
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2016
Career Facts
1
Career teams
8
Seasons tracked
166
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 8 tracked seasons, 45 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.